Alternatives
Products that do what agent-manager does
The fastest workflow for developing with AI
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14TS
2017 · tmuxp.git-pull.com
- 15SR
Hello all, I'm a software developer. Over the last few months more and more of my work has turned into using coding agents instead of typing the whole code myself. Usually a few claude sessions at once, sometimes codex, one per feature or per revealed bug. I ran them in a split terminal for a few weeks, and quickly spotted two main problems. The first is that I couldn't easily tell which agent was stuck waiting on me and which was still working, so I'd cycle through sessions and checking on them. The second one: agents sharing a single branch step on each other. Two of them could be editing…
Jul 2026 · shikigami.dev
- 16
- 17
- 18TT
2016 · github.com
- 19AL
Hi HN, I built agentspace because I kept seeing tmux recommended for keeping Claude Code sessions alive over SSH. I find multiplexers painful because they subtly change shell behavior in ways I always forget. They also do not offer a standardized way to run highly permissive agents in a safe way. I also tried worktrees, but it just feels awkward to manage work in that way. Docker can help with all of this, so I thought up a workflow and used some shell aliases to automate spawning Claude/Codex agents into docker containers. I ended up creating a cli to wrap all these methods and would…
Jun 2026 · github.com
- 20CR
Hey HN, Over the past 10 months I've been using Claude Code heavily, and one limitation kept coming up: you can really only run one coding agent at a time. While one agent is refactoring something, the rest of the repo is basically blocked unless you start manually juggling branches and working directories. The core issue is that AI coding agents operate directly in your filesystem. If two agents run in the same working directory they quickly start stepping on each other’s changes. Git worktrees turned out to be a surprisingly good primitive for solving this. So I built ChatML, a Desktop app…
Mar 2026 · github.com
- 21RA
Hey HN, There’s been a lot of interest recently in meta-harnesses, loops, and multi-agent orchestration. Obviously, there are already a lot of good tools: Conductor, cmux, the native Codex / Claude Code apps, etc. For my own use cases, I’ve felt that the orchestration layer tends to feel overengineered. I mostly wanted a simple local harness (i.e Pi) for running and tracking CLI agents with the ability to hop in (via tmux). Relaymux is my opinionated attempt at that. A few design principles: - The frontend is just Telegram / iMessage / CLI. If I want more visibility, I hop…
Jun 2026 · github.com
- 22OA
I've been running Claude Code and Codex together every day. At some point I figured out you can use tmux to let them talk to each other, so I started doing that. Once they could coordinate, I kept adding more agents. Before long I had a whole team working together. But any time I rebooted my machine, the whole thing was gone. Not just the tabs. The way they were wired up, what each one was doing, all of it. Nothing I'd found treats your agent setup as a topology, as something with a shape you can save and bring back. So I built OpenRig, a multi-agent harness. A harness wraps a model. A "rig"…
Apr 2026 · github.com
- 23
- 24
Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →