Alternatives
Products that do what ArmorClaw does
ArmorClaw by ArmorIQ
- 1MS
I run OpenClaw agents with access to email, calendar, and files, and kept worrying about them doing things I never actually asked for. ArmorClaw captures intent and cryptographically binds the agent’s tool use to that committed intent. If an agent tries to call a tool outside that plan, it gets rejected. For example, if you ask your agent to ‘email dad asking how he’s doing,’ it should only need your email tool. If it also tries to read your calendar, ArmorClaw rejects that. It’s an open-source OpenClaw plugin, and installation is one command: curl -fsSL…
Apr 2026 · claw.armoriq.ai
- 2

- 3

- 4

- 5
- 6

Real-time observability dashboard for OpenClaw AI agents
Feb 2026 · clawmetry.com
- 7CP
At Deno we've been using OpenClaw and other agents increasingly for addressing production problems in Deno Deploy - when a PagerDuty alert fires, the agent starts researching the cause and making fixes. In order to do this, the agent needs access to real production systems - postgres, kubernetes, gcp, clickhouse, github, etc. But this is dangerous to say the least - we want destructive actions to be reviewed by other LLMs, approved by humans, and logged appropriately. Claw Patrol terminates TCP connections over WireGuard or Tailscale, then parses application protocols (eg http, postgres,…
Jun 2026 · github.com
- 8OS
Hi HN, I forked chromium and built agent-browser-protocol (ABP) after noticing that most browser-agent failures aren’t really about the model misunderstanding the page. Instead, the problem is that the model is reasoning from a stale state. ABP is designed to keep the acting agent synchronized with the browser at every step. After each action (click, type, etc), it freezes JavaScript execution and rendering, then captures the resulting state. It also compiles the notable events that occurred during that action loop, such as navigation, file pickers, permission prompts, alerts, and downloads,…
Mar 2026 · github.com
- 9

Turn your work activity into structured AI context.
Feb 2026 · claw.toggle.pro
- 10FO
Hey HN, We built FireClaw because we kept watching AI agents get owned by prompt injection through web content. The agent fetches a page, the page says "ignore previous instructions," and suddenly your agent is leaking data or running commands it shouldn't. The existing solutions detect injection after the fact. We wanted to prevent it. FireClaw is a security proxy that sits between your AI agent and the web. Every fetch passes through a 4-stage pipeline: 1. DNS blocklist check (URLhaus, PhishTank, community feed) 2. Structural sanitization (strip hidden CSS, zero-width Unicode, encoding…
Mar 2026 · github.com
- 11

- 12

- 13

- 14

- 15

- 16
Your AI agent does nothing without your say-so.
Feb 2026 · authensor.github.io
- 17

Show HN: Runtime authorization for Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex Hi HN, Fernando and I built Kastra. Kastra intercepts AI agent tool calls and evaluates them against deterministic policies before they execute. This is aimed at developers using coding agents like Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and OpenClaw. We built Kastra after one of our Cursor agents almost executed DELETE FROM customers WHERE status='test' against a production database. We caught it before it ran, but it made us realize that nothing in our stack actually decided what the agent was allowed to do. What mattered for us wasn't…
Jul 2026 · kastra.ai
- 18

- 19AA
At my last company, we connected Claude Code and Cursor to almost all our internal services via MCP. It made the team incredibly fast, but we hit a wall: permissions. If you give an agent "Read Only" access, it can’t actually fix anything. If you give it "Write" access, it’s only a matter of time before a hallucination or a bad prompt results in a deleted database or a nuked production bucket. We had a few "close calls" that convinced us that simply reducing IAM permissions makes agents useless. I built Armour (https://github.com/fuushyn/armour) to solve this. It’s a…
Jan 2026 · github.com
- 20

- 21OB
Apr 2026 · github.com
- 22

- 23

- 24

Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →