nowfound

Alternatives

Products that do what GitHub does

Cut LLM token costs 30–60% — local, instant, zero API calls

  1. 1
    Paritok258

    Spend up to 85% less and run 3× longer coding agent sessions

    28d ago · paritok.com

  2. 2

    Cut LLM token costs 40-70% with offline prompt compression

    Jul 2026 · llmslim.app

  3. 3

    Cut your LLM Token Costs by 65%

    Jul 2026 · supercompress.dev

  4. 4TP

    Hey HN! Tokencost is a utility library for estimating LLM costs. There are hundreds of different models now, and they all have their own pricing schemes. It’s difficult to keep up with the pricing changes, and it’s even more difficult to estimate how much your prompts and completions will cost until you see the bill. Tokencost works by counting the number of tokens in prompt and completion messages and multiplying that number by the corresponding model cost. Under the hood, it’s really just a simple cost dictionary and some utility functions for getting the prices right. It also accounts for…

    2024 · github.com

  5. 5WW

    I spent a few hours last weekend testing whether AI can replace code by executing directly. Built a contact manager where every HTTP request goes to an LLM with three tools: database (SQLite), webResponse (HTML/JSON/JS), and updateMemory (feedback). No routes, no controllers, no business logic. The AI designs schemas on first request, generates UIs from paths alone, and evolves based on natural language feedback. It works—forms submit, data persists, APIs return JSON—but it's catastrophically slow (30-60s per request), absurdly expensive ($0.05/request), and has zero UI…

    Nov 2025 · github.com

  6. 6AU

    Hi HN, I was once given the advice: Don't waste expensive frontier model credits (GPT/Claude/etc.) on bulk work. Send the boring, repetitive, high-volume jobs to a smaller model, and save the expensive prompts for when you actually need frontier-level reasoning. I complained and told my manager that I shouldnt have to think about using certain models for certain coding tasks, and that one model should handle everything. Well, here we are anyway. If anyone needs a place to absolutely abuse an LLM with high-volume tasks, come beat ours up at https://yolo-auto.com. Here are…

    Jul 2026 · yolo-auto.com

  7. 7

    See your LLM token bill before you hit send.

    2025

  8. 8

    RAG-ready web scraping that cuts your LLM token costs

    Apr 2026 · geekflare.com

  9. 9

    Use Codex at 35.6% lower costs

    Apr 2026 · edgee.ai

  10. 10
    Code Mode144

    Slash MCP token usage by 68%

    Nov 2025

  11. 11CS

    Hi HN! Token cost has started to become a high topic of concern to all of us. I tried a few (awesome) tools such as rtk, caveman, and the recent (hillarious but effective) ponytail. What they usually do, is in-line token reduction, e.g. try to compress requests / responses as much as possible. But then it hit me (and I’m sure others had similar ideas) - just like we have routers that pick the right model, why not have something that will also narrow down the amount of available tools, skills and mcps based on repo/context? People usually accumulate skills, agents, MCP servers,…

    Jun 2026 · github.com

  12. 12

    Cut LLM API costs by 65%. No GPU. No code changes.

    Apr 2026 · twotrim.com

  13. 13LC

    Hi HN, I'm building Librarian (https://uselibrarian.dev/), an open-source (MIT) context management tool that stops AI agents from burning tokens by blindly re-reading their entire conversation history on every turn. The Problem: If you're building agentic loops in frameworks like LangGraph or OpenClaw, you hit two walls fast: Financial Cost: Token usage scales quadratically over long conversations. Passing the whole history every time gets incredibly expensive. Context Rot: As the context window fills up, the LLM suffers from the "Lost in the Middle" effect. Response latency…

    Feb 2026 · uselibrarian.dev

  14. 14

    Cut LLM Costs 30-80% 2-Minute Setup.

    Dec 2025

  15. 15

    Compress markdown for LLMs. Cut token usage drastically.

    Feb 2026 · compress.new

  16. 16

    Cuts your LLM API costs by 40-70%. One line of code.

    May 2026 · semanticguard.dev

  17. 17

    Cut LLM API costs 50% with prompt injection defense

    Apr 2026

  18. 18RC

    Hello HN! We're building a caching solution for LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude). By combining cutting-edge approaches, such as edge computing, prompt compression, vectorization, and others - it can reduce your AI bills by up to 10x and significantly lower response times. Key Features: - cost efficiency: our system stores frequent queries, reducing the number of upstream (paid) API calls - fast responses: with various nodes globally, we reduce latency by serving data from the nearest location - scalability: designed to handle increasing loads and data sizes without degrading performance. The cache…

    2024 · edgematic.dev

  19. 19

    Cut LLM costs. Free audit, pay only if it works.

    Jun 2026 · decomp-ai.vercel.app

  20. 20

    One API. Lowest token prices.

    Jul 2026 · videorouter.sh

  21. 21

    Cut AI token costs 30-60% with smarter JSON encoding

    Nov 2025

  22. 22PR

    Hi HN, While building RAG agents, I noticed a lot of token budget was wasted on formatting overhead (HTML tags, JSON structure, whitespace). Existing solutions felt too heavy (often requiring torch&#x2F;transformers), so I wrote this lightweight, zero-dependency library to solve it. It includes strategies for context packing, PII redaction, and tool output compression. Benchmarks show it can save ~15% of tokens with negligible latency overhead (<0.5ms). Happy to answer any questions!

    Dec 2025 · github.com

  23. 23TS

    Hi everyone, I just released an open source load testing tool for LLMs: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;twerkmeister&#x2F;tokenflood === What is it and what problems does it solve? === Tokenflood is a load testing tool for instruction-tuned LLMs hat can simulate arbitrary LLM loads in terms of prompt, prefix, and output lengths and requests per second. Instead of first collecting prompt data for different load types, you can configure the desired parameters for your load test and you are good to go. It also let's you assess the latency effects of potential prompt parameter changes before…

    Nov 2025 · github.com

  24. 24

    GigantByte | TokenShrinker

    Jul 2026

Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →