nowfound

Alternatives

Products that do what Google Maps but for your repo (Open Source) does

Hi HN, I built Repomap, a tool that generates interactive architecture diagrams from any GitHub repository. It uses a Rust + tree-sitter engine to analyze the codebase and produces a D3-based graph UI with clustering, zoom/pan, and live progress updates

  1. 1GT

    2017 · gitorials.com

  2. 2

    Make devs notice your repo

    Nov 2025

  3. 3GI
  4. 4

    A 3D visualization of your Git contributions

    2024

  5. 5

    Free analysis & insights for any GitHub repository

    2023

  6. 6

    Enter user/repo and see the project visually

    2016

  7. 7

    Visualize codebases & co-create software architecture

    Sep 2025

  8. 8
    Viz94

    Visualize GitHub's newest, most popular repos

    2017

  9. 9GS
  10. 10

    Visualize repo structures in tree view.

    2025

  11. 11
    GitCity113

    Your GitHub contributions as 3D city you can drive through

    Apr 2026

  12. 12GT

    2014 · tomiaijo.github.io

  13. 13

    Allows you to draw in your github heatmap

    2016

  14. 14

    Give your GitHub README.md some insightful eye-candy

    2021

  15. 15WC

    Hi all, I'm Ivan, and together with Alex, we're building a diagram visualization tool for codebases. Alex and I are devs, and we've noticed that recently we've been super productive at writing code (prompting :D). But when it comes to understanding big systems, prompting doesn't work that well — for that, diagrams are best imo. Most tools out there don't scale to big projects (e.g. PyTorch), so we're building CodeBoarding — a recursive visualizer for codebases. It starts from the highest level of abstractions and lets you dive deeper. We use static analysis and LLM agents. The control-flow…

    2025 · github.com

  16. 16VG
  17. 17TT

    Jul 2026 · codemap.gitbiased.com

  18. 18OS
  19. 19BE
  20. 20IE
  21. 21GI
  22. 22VV
  23. 23VG
  24. 24T3

    2018 · areknawo.github.io

Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →