Alternatives
Products that do what Koredex does
Automatically fixes failing pytest test and proves it worked
- 1LD
Hi HN! We’re Adrien and Kanav. We met at our previous job, where we spent about a third of our lives combating a constant firehose of bugs. In the hope of reducing this pain for others in the future, we’re working on automating debugging. We’re currently working on a platform that ingests logs and then automatically reproduces, root causes and ultimately fixes production bugs as they happen. You can see some of our work on this here - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39528087 As we were building the root-cause phase of our automated debugger, we realized that we developed…
2024 · github.com
- 2
Claude Code auto-fix ▲370Auto-fix PRs in the cloud while you stay hands-off
Mar 2026 · code.claude.com
- 3

- 4KA
I built this because Cursor, Claude Code and other agentic AI tools kept giving me tests that looked fine but failed when I ran them. Or worse - I'd ask the agent to run them and it would start looping: fix tests, those fail, then it starts "fixing" my code so tests pass, or just deletes assertions so they "pass". Out of that frustration I built KeelTest - a VS Code extension that generates pytest tests and executes them, got hooked and decided to push this project forward... When tests fail, it tries to figure out why: - Generation error: Attemps to fix it automatically, then tries again -…
Jan 2026 · keelcode.dev
- 5PW
2021 · github.com
- 6

- 7IB
I got sick of the old software development loop: Change code -> Run tests -> wait -> wait some more -> look at failures. I decided to build a tool that will enable you to: Change code -> look at failures. No wait time, no explicit test running. Under the hood: - Runs the whole test suite and collects code coverage per test. - For each auto file save, analyzes the changes on the tests. - Runs changed tests in the background. - Display results, the loop time from change to test results is approx 250ms. Instead of: code -> alt+tab -> arrow up -> rerun all the tests -> wait ... -> test results…
2022 · github.com
- 8

- 9

- 10

- 11

- 12

- 13WB
Hi, we are working on a tool for speeding up test runs, by skipping tests unaffected by code changes. Effectivly, Saving 80-95% of the time, by skipping 80-95% of tests. We started a few months ago, and have managed to get into a few production CI systems. All our prospects and users are on holiday right now. So we decided to repackage and open-source for local test running. available here (https://github.com/nabaz-io/nabaz) under MIT license. One line change: pytest -v -> nabaz test --cmdline "pytest -v" Stalk us on GitHub, or just Star us. Ask questions, we'll answer in…
2022 · github.com
- 14DF
2019 · github.com
- 15

- 16AT
2017 · github.com
- 17AC
2024 · github.com
- 18TD
Hey HN, I'm Marcel from Tusk. We’re launching Tusk Drift, an open source tool that generates a full API test suite by recording and replaying live traffic. How it works: 1. Records traces from live traffic (what gets captured) 2. Replays traces as API tests with mocked responses (how replay works) 3. Detects deviations between actual vs. expected output (what you get) Unlike traditional mocking libraries, which require you to manually emulate how dependencies behave, Tusk Drift automatically records what these dependencies respond with based on actual user behavior and maintains recordings…
Nov 2025 · github.com
- 19WG
Run your scripts with Wolverine and when they crash, GPT-4 edits them and explains what went wrong. Even if you have many bugs it will repeatedly rerun until it's fixed. Demo video on twitter: https://twitter.com/bio_bootloader/status/163688020830443110...
2023 · github.com
- 20AF
2015 · github.com
- 21

- 22

Review the Python you changed, not the Python you inherited. Git-aware AST code review that runs in the seconds before git push. - mukundzha/avouch
19d ago · github.com
- 23

A CI gate for testing AI prompts and preventing regressions. - mukundzha/crilio
12d ago · github.com
- 24PS
2024 · github.com
Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →