nowfound

Alternatives

Products that do what ModelScout does

Find the best LLM for your product

  1. 1

    Compare LLMs on your data, measure, and pick the best.

    Apr 2026 · trismik.com

  2. 2
    LLM Stats308

    Compare API models by benchmarks, cost & capabilities

    Oct 2025

  3. 3FT
  4. 4

    Vibe-check many open-source and proprietary LLMs at once

    2024

  5. 5
    Mammouth190

    Get access to the best LLMs in one place for 10€

    2024

  6. 6OS

    Looking for the cheapest place to deploy llama 3.1 model? Don't worry we have found it so you don't have to.

    2024 · github.com

  7. 7AT

    I recently built a small open-source tool to benchmark different LLM API endpoints — including OpenAI, Claude, and self-hosted models (like llama.cpp). It runs a configurable number of test requests and reports two key metrics: • First-token latency (ms): How long it takes for the first token to appear • Output speed (tokens/sec): Overall output fluency Demo: https://llmapitest.com/ Code: https://github.com/qjr87/llm-api-test The goal is to provide a simple, visual, and reproducible way to evaluate performance across different LLM providers, including…

    2025 · llmapitest.com

  8. 8IB

    I was overspending on GPT-4o. It was really hard to compare different models I could switch to, so I built this LLM comparison tool. It shows leaderboards, pricing, and performance data across 100+ LLMs (including all major providers and open-source models). Key features: - Live pricing comparisons - Benchmark Scores (MMLU, HumanEval, GPQA, etc.) - Context length vs cost analysis - Speed/throughput tests across providers - Quality vs price visualizations - Open source (all data verifiable) Try it out: https://llmstats.com I'd like to know your opinion :) Tech stack: Next.js,…

    2025 · llm-stats.com

  9. 9UD

    Hey HN! I’m the founder of Unify, and we’ve just released our Model Hub, which provides a collection of LLM endpoints with live runtime benchmarks all plotted across time: https://unify.ai/hub A key finding is that static tabular runtime benchmarks for LLMs simply do not work. It’s necessary to take a time-series perspective, and plot the variations through time. We currently have 21 models provided by: Anyscale, Perplexity AI, Replicate, Together AI, OctoAI, Mistral AI and OpenAI, with more on the roadmap. We test across different regions (Asia, US, Europe), with varied…

    2024

  10. 10LL

    Hey Folks! I've been building an open source benchmark for measuring local LLM performance on your own hardware. The benchmarking tool is a CLI written on top of Llamafile to allow for portability across different hardware setups and operating systems. The website is a database of results from the benchmark, allowing you to explore the performance of different models and hardware configurations. Please give it a try! Any feedback and contribution is much appreciated. I'd love for this to serve as a helpful resource for the local AI community. For more check out: - Website:…

    2025 · localscore.ai

  11. 11

    Pick the best LLM. Compare costs and performance.

    Mar 2026 · loopthink.ai

  12. 12

    LLM Provider arbitrage to get the best performance for the $

    2025

  13. 13IB

    Hey HN, I've been working on something cool that I wanted to share with you all. It's called Viewpoint, an analytics tool for LLMs like OpenAI, Anthropic models, and Gemini. The idea came from the constant flood of new LLM models and the need to figure out which ones work best for my projects without breaking the bank. With viewpoint, I can track token usage, costs, latency(WIP), and traffic over time, making it easier to compare different models and see which ones perform best and save money. The tool works asynchronously, so it doesn't add any latency to your LLM requests, and you have…

    2024 · viewpointhq.com

  14. 14FL

    Hi HN community, I have been working on benchmarking publicly available LLMs these past couple of weeks. More precisely, I am interested on the finetuning piece since a lot of businesses are starting to entertain the idea of self-hosting LLMs trained on their proprietary data rather than relying on third party APIs. To this point, I am tracking the following 4 pillars of evaluation that businesses are typically look into: - Performance - Time to train an LLM - Cost to train an LLM - Inference (throughput / latency / cost per token) For each LLM, my aim is to benchmark them for…

    2023 · github.com

  15. 15

    Compare GPT, Claude, Gemini & DeepSeek by cost & benchmark

    11d ago · universalnest.com

  16. 16FT

    2024 · github.com

  17. 17

    Test your real data and find your perfect AI model

    Sep 2025

  18. 18GV

    Hey HN, I just updated my project that compares some LLMs. It uses your prompt for all the models and runs at the same time. You can see the results being generated in real-time and decide what's the best for your use case. I'm open to any suggestions and feedback. Thanks!

    2024 · geminivsgpt.com

  19. 19

    Benchmark AI models for YOUR use case

    Jan 2026 · openmark.ai

  20. 20SY

    Hey HN, If you tried running open-source models like Llama 3.1 70B or 405B, you might have noticed that it gets very expensive. The reason looks obvious enough that you might have stopped even before trying it! - GPUs are very expensive to buy or rent - Running the most performing LLMs need 4, 8 or even 16 top of the line Nvidia GPUs - And that won’t get you anywhere near the level of VRAM needed to batch enough to get a decent throughput and efficiency Some have even questioned if open-source LLM providers are not doing some shenanigans to provide the prices they offer. VC funded…

    2024

  21. 21

    Explore and compare AI models and their benchmarks

    Nov 2025

  22. 22

    The ultimate LLM comparison tool

    Jan 2026 · whatllm.org

  23. 23

    Real-time AI news, analysis & LLM benchmarks

    Oct 2025

  24. 24L1

    PoC for something some the potential to yield some interesting results eventually.

    2025 · github.com

Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →