Alternatives
Products that do what Open Review – Scientific peer review is broken. We want to fix it does
- 1AP
After waiting 8 months for a journal response or two months for co-author feedback that consisted of "looks good" and a single comma change, we built an AI-powered peer review system that helps researchers improve their manuscripts rapidly before submission. The system uses multiple specialized agents to analyze different aspects of scientific papers, from methodology to writing quality. Key features: 24 specialized agents analyzing sections, scientific rigor, and writing quality // Detailed feedback with actionable recommendations. // PDF report generation. //…
2025 · github.com
- 2OA
2019 · git.sr.ht
- 3ST
2019 · adamsgaard.dk
- 4AH
2018 · upvote.pub
- 5CS
2014 · coredemia.com
- 6AO
2011 · science.io
- 7PO
2021 · pairagraph.com
- 8VA
2021 · vellum.tachy.org
- 9
- 10LA
2016 · github.com
- 11
- 12
- 13AN
2014 · saysaw.org
- 14DC
2015 · docrev.org
- 15OB
2016 · github.com
- 16
- 17PO
2012 · petridish.org
- 18UO
2014 · usefulscience.org
- 19LC
2014 · hangouts.readthesource.io
- 20DS
2020 · dagshub.com
- 21LY
Almost one year ago I asked HN if anybody is interested to make a Web app to make reading and finding scientific papers smarter [http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1664648]. No one did, at least no one did what "I" think is the best way to approach this problem. A a few month ago I decided to do it myself.<p>Meet JournalClub iPad app (absolutely free), http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/journalclub/id443819334? I have a recommendation engine in the pipeline that I would introduce in the next update (hopefully in a month or so). I really appreciate any comments, feedbacks.
2011
- 22SO
2018 · sci-share.com
- 23AN
Over the last two years, we’ve seen just how quickly science can move when it’s conducted out in the open, and the focus is on content rather than the publishing process. We’ve built a new way for researchers and scientists to communicate and share their findings with the world - rethought from first principles, with a lot more coming soon. Free to use, and available now for anyone with a university email address. We’re whitelisting organizations that conduct and publish research on a rolling basis. Please forward feedback and thoughts to [email protected] or comment here!
2022 · dystr.com
- 24PR
Hi HN, I've had the idea for a scholarly publishing site that could crowdsource the work of the journals using concepts borrowed from Github and StackExchange and recombined for years. I finally got enough runway to take about 6 months off of work to build it. This is the result. It's still in beta, but the core MVP features - review, reputation, responses - are all there. I'm sure there are as yet to be found bugs, because I'm on my own and I've always been terrible at testing my own stuff. Right now it's best treated as non-archival pre-prints with review. I'm starting my next full time…
2023 · peer-review.io
Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →