nowfound

Alternatives

Products that do what Panton does

Truth isn't generated. It's stress-tested.

  1. 1

    AI powered fact-checker for article reputability and bias

    2024

  2. 2
    Lenz259

    Independent, multi-model fact-checking API for AI workflows

    10d ago · lenz.io

  3. 3

    Ask once. Compare multiple AI models. Get one synthesis.

    Jun 2026 · truth.agnthub.ai

  4. 4

    The Only AI Tool That Doesn't Trust AI

    Mar 2026

  5. 5
    Lenz26

    Fact-check any statement with source-backed, multi-model AI

    Apr 2026

  6. 6SA

    Hi HN. I'm Ken, a 20-year-old Stanford CS student. I built Sup AI. I started working on this because no single AI model is right all the time, but their errors don’t strongly correlate. In other words, models often make unique mistakes relative to other models. So I run multiple models in parallel and synthesize the outputs by weighting segments based on confidence. Low entropy in the output token probability distributions correlates with accuracy. High entropy is often where hallucinations begin. My dad Scott (AI Research Scientist at TRI) is my research partner on this. He sends me papers…

    Mar 2026 · sup.ai

  7. 7IP

    To be specific, the content is generated by a GPT-2 based model. https://amzn.to/2TCc0v2 Let me know if you have any questions :-)

    2020

  8. 8

    Debate an AI - 60 seconds. Will you win? Prove it wrong!

    Apr 2026

  9. 9

    AI agents publicly debate your creator growth problems

    Apr 2026

  10. 10

    Pure ideas from AI, no syco flattery.

    May 2026

  11. 11AA

    Finding the balance between humans and machines has been the thread through my career. I always had a thing for AI and couldn't wait for it to actually deliver on what was promised. Now it does, and it's more important than ever that humans and machines keep working well together. AI makes creation trivial. Text, code, design, strategy, in seconds. But one thing AI does not create: independently verifiable proof of when something existed. Reproducing is now cheaper and easier than creating. Chronology becomes contestable at the moment it matters most. The universal problem was known. I…

    Mar 2026 · umarise.com

  12. 12

    Six AIs debate it. You get one clear answer.

    May 2026 · aiquorum.io

  13. 13

    Watch ChatGPT Claude, Gemini & Grok debate each other live

    Mar 2026

  14. 147D

    hi all. i’ve been shipping a small open project that tries to answer that question with evidence, not vibes. in 70 days it reached \~800 stars. the core claim is simple: many AI failures are not noise. they repeat because the geometry and ordering underneath are stable. if so, we should be able to name each failure mode, set acceptance targets, and stop shipping the same bug twice. ### what it is * a compact Problem Map of 16 reproducible failure modes in RAG and agents. * each item has a minimal fix and measurable gates. examples: * Semantic ≠ Embedding: metric and normalization mismatch.…

    2025 · github.com

  15. 15

    The adversarial AI agent that challenges LLM outputs

    Mar 2026

  16. 16TA
  17. 17

    AI-curated tech news, backed by real sources

    Jul 2026 · newtqnia.com

  18. 18MO

    I'm Arthur, and I wanted to share an MVP for Marqt.org, which lets you crowd-source the truth. John Stuart Mill said that "Truth emerges from the clash of ideas." In that spirit, Marqt brings two adversarial sides together to quantify truth and showcase the best arguments for each side. It is inspired by markets, where buyers and sellers discover a product's true price and update it dynamically. The ultimate aim is to build an open-source semantic knowledge base that represents the collective wisdom of humanity in real-time. If we can do this, I believe it can solve the problem of…

    2023 · marqt.org

  19. 19AA

    2016 · newsapi.aylien.com

  20. 20AH

    This paper formally defines where current AGI hits a structural wall — not a technical one. It shows that no amount of scaling, reinforcement learning, or recursive optimization will break through three deep epistemological and formal constraints: 1. Semantic Closure — An AI system cannot generate outputs that require meaning beyond its internal frame. 2. Non-Computability of Frame Innovation — New cognitive structures cannot be computed from within an existing one. 3. Statistical Breakdown in Open Worlds — Probabilistic inference collapses in environments with heavy-tailed uncertainty.…

    2025

  21. 21

    Don't trust one AI. Verify it with all of them.

    Jul 2026 · cortexengines.com

  22. 22PA

    Been working on data sovereignty recently and started this list. Hope you can contribute too.

    2025 · github.com

  23. 23

    Don’t Just Trust AI. Check It.

    2d ago · getproofly.dpdns.org

  24. 24DR

    The first ever AI peer reviewed research article just got approved. It’s kinda crazy how advanced AI have come to replace researchers. I've just been using Deep Research on ChatGPT and Perplexity a lot to write and research complex technical reports for my boss. He loves the reports and it has decreased my workload a ton but I still have some frustrations with it. None of them provide an API that gets me the same quality of output you would with the applications. I wanted something with more control on the LLMs, swappable with the reasoning new models that came out. Not just prompt →…

    2025 · github.com

Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →