Alternatives
Products that do what Safuclaw does
Security audits for AI agent skills. Pay per scan.
- 1
- 2

- 3

- 4

- 5NC
I’ve been running Clawdbot for the last couple weeks and have genuinely found it useful but running it scares the crap out of me. OpenClaw has 52+ modules and runs agents with near-unlimited permissions in a single Node process. NanoClaw is ~500 lines of core code, agents run in actual Apple containers with filesystem isolation. Each chat gets its own sandboxed context. This is not a swiss army knife. It’s built to match my exact needs. Fork it and make it yours.
Feb 2026 · github.com
- 6
- 7

- 8

Real-time observability dashboard for OpenClaw AI agents
Feb 2026 · clawmetry.com
- 9

- 10

- 11

Everything in OpenClaw's terminal, you can now do visually
Apr 2026 · rectify.so
- 12

- 13

13,000+ MCP servers, skills & plugins for AI coding agents
Jul 2026 · codexmarketplaces.com
- 14

- 15

- 16

- 17

- 18
- 19
The unbiased security scanner for OpenClaw skills
Apr 2026 · clawdit.work
- 20

Open-source security gateway & static scanner for AI agents. Enforce role-based access control (RBAC), human-in-the-loop approvals, segregation of duties, and cryptographically signed, offline-verifiable audit logs. - makerchecker/MakerChecker
Jul 2026 · github.com
- 21FO
Hey HN, We built FireClaw because we kept watching AI agents get owned by prompt injection through web content. The agent fetches a page, the page says "ignore previous instructions," and suddenly your agent is leaking data or running commands it shouldn't. The existing solutions detect injection after the fact. We wanted to prevent it. FireClaw is a security proxy that sits between your AI agent and the web. Every fetch passes through a 4-stage pipeline: 1. DNS blocklist check (URLhaus, PhishTank, community feed) 2. Structural sanitization (strip hidden CSS, zero-width Unicode, encoding…
Mar 2026 · github.com
- 22

- 23

- 24

OpenClaw hosting as a service with unlimited AI tokens
Mar 2026 · penclaw.ai
Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →