Alternatives
Products that do what TrueStory does
QA testing for Jira with AI test generation and PR gating
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12AG
A little idea I got from playing with AI SWE Agents. Can AI help make sure we understand the code that our AIs write? PR Quiz uses AI to generate a quiz from a pull request and blocks you from merging until the quiz is passed. You can configure various options like the LLM model to use, max number of attempts to pass the quiz or min diff size to generate a quiz for. I found that the reasoning models, while more expensive, generated better questions from my limited testing. Privacy: This GitHub Action runs a local webserver and uses ngrok to serve the quiz through a temporary url. Your code…
2025 · github.com
- 13
- 14DQ
Hey there! We use this currently for releasing the Agent [1] and thought it would be nice to open up broadly for others. [1]: https://docs.datadoghq.com/agent/
2023 · github.com
- 15OS
GitHub - https://github.com/vostride/agent-qa Live Demos - https://vostride.com/demo/agent-qa
May 2026 · vostride.com
- 16CS
We now write most of our code with agents. For a while, PRs piled up, causing review fatigue, and we had this sinking feeling that standards were slipping. Consistency is tough at this volume. I’m sharing the solution we found, which has become our main product. Continue (https://docs.continue.dev) runs AI checks on every PR. Each check is a source-controlled markdown file in `.continue/checks/` that shows up as a GitHub status check. They run as full agents, not just reading the diff, but able to read/write files, run bash commands, and use a browser. If it finds…
Feb 2026 · docs.continue.dev
- 17IB
I've been using Claude Code heavily, and kept hitting the same issue: the agent would push changes, respond to reviews, wait for CI... but never really know when it was done. It would poll CI in loops. Miss actionable comments buried among 15 CodeRabbit suggestions. Or declare victory while threads were still unresolved. The core problem: no deterministic way for an agent to know a PR is ready to merge. So I built gtg (Good To Go). One command, one answer: $ gtg 123 OK PR #123: READY CI: success (5/5 passed) Threads: 3/3 resolved It aggregates CI status, classifies review comments…
Jan 2026 · dsifry.github.io
- 18
- 19QA
Hey HN! I've been building Quell, an AI QA testing agent designed to run tests directly triggered from issue trackers (Jira, Linear) or designs (Figma) or CI/CD platforms (Vercel, Netlify, GitHub), ensuring rapid and accurate acceptance testing without manual effort. What problem does it solve? As a product manager and founder myself, I constantly faced issues releasing a new feature only to discover critical bugs or that the build doesn't fully meet acceptance criteria. Bottlenecks in our QA and release process—tickets and issues stuck in manual testing, slow deployments due to delayed…
2025 · quellit.ai
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →