Googling a sentence yields copycat sites and poor results in general
Take the following sentence for example, searched in google with quotation marks included: "Booster seats, car seats and seat belts are equally effective at saving the lives of children" This is a sentence that originated (as far as I know) from here: http://www.montana.edu/news/17359/msu-studies-investigate-ef.... The first page of results contains various websites that, on the surface, contain the quoted sentence but on closer inspection, contains the entire original content from montana.edu verbatim. Additionally, the first 5 results are from sciencedaily.com,…
What it does
In the maker’s words, at launch
Take the following sentence for example, searched in google with quotation marks included: "Booster seats, car seats and seat belts are equally effective at saving the lives of children" This is a sentence that originated (as far as I know) from here: http://www.montana.edu/news/17359/msu-studies-investigate-ef.... The first page of results contains various websites that, on the surface, contain the quoted sentence but on closer inspection, contains the entire original content from montana.edu verbatim. Additionally, the first 5 results are from sciencedaily.com, with different titles for each result and were created (supposedly) over the past 10 years or so. Now if you go to the second page of results, the majority of results are now sciencedaily.com but by exploring the links, you find the phrase is embedded as a link to articles first shown as results on the first page of google search results. I thought this was interesting so I attempted to look up what might be another widely copied type of sentence across websites to see what other articles are copy and pasted everywhere, example from https://www.activistpost.com/2013/09/22-medical-studies-that...: "The vaccine-autism debate has been going on for years. It has been a tale of shifting beliefs as child vaccination rates remain high" In this case, searching this sentence, quotes included, yielded results as before highlighting the sentence in almost every result that I found but the article itself was not copy and pasted verbatim as before. In any case, thought this might be interesting to share. Perhaps this show the futility or limitations of searching this type of content or it may also show how many websites are merely reposting noteworthy content in order to generate clicks or mislead people into thinking their website is legitimate when it comes to scientific data or studies.
Does the same job
all alternatives →- IMI made a website to semantically search ArXiv papers2024 · papermatch.mitanshu.tech · ▲324
As a grad student (and an ADHDer), I had trouble doing literature review systematically. To combat this, I made a website that finds similar papers using the meaning of the thing I am looking for. I used MixedBread's [^1] embedding model to generate vectors from the abstracts. I store and search similar vectors using Milvus [^2] and finally use Gradio [^3] to serve the frontend. I update the vector database weekly by pulling the metadata dataset from Kaggle [^4]. To speed up the search process on my free oracle instance, I binarise the embeddings and use Hamming distance as a metric. I would…
- WCWordsForThat.com - A new site that's like a reverse urban dictionary2013 · wordsforthat.com · ▲151
- UOusefulscience.org – one sentence summaries of journal articles2014 · usefulscience.org · ▲15
More growth this month
the category →
AstraPixels▲267A pixel-art solar system at its real current positions.
Growth · 29d ago · astrapixels.com
Launched alongside, July 2018
the whole month →- BA
Life & fun · 2018 · brow.sh
- TR
Dev tools · 2018 · github.com
