nowfound

Growth · March 17, 2026

Perffeco

AI cost intelligence for LLM, GPU, and benchmark decisions

What it does

Perffeco helps AI teams make faster, smarter infrastructure decisions by tracking LLM pricing, GPU cloud costs, and model benchmarks in one place. Unlike static comparison pages, it combines daily-updated data, independent analysis, cost-per-quality insights, provider comparisons, and practical FinOps tools. You can compare 23 models, 12 GPU providers, benchmark performance, spot cheaper alternatives, and estimate savings before you commit spend.

Does the same job

all alternatives →
  • LLM StatsOct 2025 · ▲308

    Compare API models by benchmarks, cost & capabilities

  • TensorZero2025 · ▲316

    Open-source stack for industrial-grade LLM applications

  • Foundations Atlas2019 · ▲96

    ML dev tool that saves you up to 8x in cloud GPU costs

  • LF
    Local fine tuning for Mistral and SDXL, GPU mem/latency optimization2023 · docs.helix.ml · ▲36

    100% bootstrapped new startup. It lets you fine tune Mistral-7B and SDXL. In particular, for the LLM fine tuning we implemented a dataprep pipeline that turns websites/pdfs/doc files into question-answer pairs for training the small LLM using an big LLM. It includes a GPU scheduler that can do finegrained GPU memory scheduling (Kubernetes can only do whole-GPU, we do it per-GB of GPU memory to pack both inference and fine tuning jobs into the same fleet) to fit model instances into GPU memory to optimally trade off user facing latency with GPU memory utilization It's a pretty…

  • FL
    finetune LLMs via the Finetuning Hub2023 · github.com · ▲80

    Hi HN community, I have been working on benchmarking publicly available LLMs these past couple of weeks. More precisely, I am interested on the finetuning piece since a lot of businesses are starting to entertain the idea of self-hosting LLMs trained on their proprietary data rather than relying on third party APIs. To this point, I am tracking the following 4 pillars of evaluation that businesses are typically look into: - Performance - Time to train an LLM - Cost to train an LLM - Inference (throughput / latency / cost per token) For each LLM, my aim is to benchmark them for…

  • AT
    A tool to benchmark LLM APIs (OpenAI, Claude, local/self-hosted)2025 · llmapitest.com · ▲55

    I recently built a small open-source tool to benchmark different LLM API endpoints — including OpenAI, Claude, and self-hosted models (like llama.cpp). It runs a configurable number of test requests and reports two key metrics: • First-token latency (ms): How long it takes for the first token to appear • Output speed (tokens/sec): Overall output fluency Demo: https://llmapitest.com/ Code: https://github.com/qjr87/llm-api-test The goal is to provide a simple, visual, and reproducible way to evaluate performance across different LLM providers, including…

More growth this month

the category →
  • Browzer427

    Put your technical content on autopilot

    Growth · 14d ago · trybrowzer.com

  • ​​A pixel-art solar system at its real current positions.​

    Growth · 29d ago · astrapixels.com

Launched alongside, March 2026

the whole month →
  • AI-native CRM that builds itself and does work for you

    AI · Mar 2026 · lightfield.app

  • Tobira.ai730

    A network where AI agents find deals for their humans

    AI · Mar 2026 · tobira.ai

  • Switch from ChatGPT to Claude with import memory feature

    AI · Mar 2026 · claude.com

  • The AI assistant that already knows your work

    AI · Mar 2026 · littlebird.ai

  • Your AI Coworker that proactively executes tasks

    AI · Mar 2026 · viktor.com

  • Jupid664

    File your taxes with Claude Code

    Commerce · Mar 2026 · jupid.com