Alternatives
Products that do what Analyze the behavior of OSS for malicious intent does
- 1PR
2016 · patchworksecurity.com
- 2CF
2019 · github.com
- 3

- 4PS
2018 · github.com
- 5AA
2018 · sephware.com
- 6WA
2017 · github.com
- 7SA
2014 · github.com
- 8VC
2020 · snyk.io
- 9AR
2013 · getanomalous.com
- 10AC
2020 · shieldfy.io
- 11LA
2014 · github.com
- 12OA
2017 · octotrack.com
- 13MI
2024 · github.com
- 14OD
2021 · osv.dev
- 15SA
2016 · sqreen.io
- 16AC
2015 · github.com
- 17AS
2020 · stackhawk.com
- 18DA
2016 · apk-deguard.com
- 19TA
2016 · github.com
- 20IB
Linux Foundation survey says 70-90% of modern software constitute OSS code. Yet we are stuck with tools that scan only for vulnerabilities in 3rd party libraries and that too with high degree of false positives. I built `vet` for policy and data driven analysis of 3rd party packages that goes beyond only vulnerability and allows codifying organisational policies related to OSS consumption. https://github.com/safedep/vet Looking forward to feedback and suggestions from HN :)
2023 · github.com
- 21AM
2020 · github.com
- 22FF
2021 · spatcher.io
- 23LT
2020 · tanelpoder.com
- 24VA
2022 · github.com
Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →