AI · alternatives · 2026
24 alternatives to GetCodeReviews
Catch bugs & security holes in seconds. No setup required.
Below are 24 products that do a similar job, ranked by how close each is in meaning and then by launch-day votes.
- 1
Automatic AI-powered code reviews the moment you open a PR
Jan 2026 · kilo.ai · its alternatives →
- 2
Automated Penetration Testing for AI-Built Apps
2021 · replay.io · its alternatives →
- 3
Fast and easy code reviews you'll love, in your IDE.
2020 · its alternatives →
- 4
Hey HN, We’re two developers (co-founders) with a team of 20 who got tired of spending hours reviewing PRs, so we built Infinitcode.ai, an AI-powered code reviewer that: - *Summarizes PRs in plain English*: No more deciphering 1,000-line diff jungles - *Catches more than bugs*: Security holes, performance pitfalls, code smells, even typos (yes, we’ll flag “vurnerabilities” and vulnerabilities) - *Zero onboarding*: Works instantly—no “let me learn your codebase for weeks” nonsense. Why we’re posting: We’re in alpha and need brutal honesty. Roast our tool, mock our UI, or tell us why AI will…
2025 · infinitcode.ai · its alternatives →
- 5
Free AI code reviews directly in the IDE
2025 · coderabbit.ai · its alternatives →
- 6
AI code review that knows when to chime in
Feb 2026 · getunblocked.com · its alternatives →
- 7
- 8
- 9
Ito▲449I'm Evan and I made Ito.ai It's code review that actually runs your code. The result is that it finds more bugs with a smaller false positive rate. You get screenshots, videos, and run logs. I built Ito because manual verification sucks and I thought I could automate it. I've been a professional developer for 15 years and now more than ever, I'm just spending time making sure things work. I looked into all of the other agentic testing tools that click around a url you give them and frankly, they sucked. They just didn't work. I figured to be able to actually testing things you need to run…
Aug 2026 · ito.ai · its alternatives →
- 10
0github.com is a pull request viewer that color-codes every diff line/token by how much human attention it probably needs. Unlike PR-review bots, we try to flag not just by "is it a bug?" but by "is it worth a second look?" (examples: hard-coded secret, weird crypto mode, gnarly logic, ugly code). To try it, replace github.com with 0github.com in any pull-request URL. Under the hood, we split the PR into individual files, and for each file, we ask an LLM to annotate each line with a data structure that we parse into a colored heatmap. Examples:…
Oct 2025 · 0github.com · its alternatives →
- 11
GitReviewed▲18Hi HN, I’m Valentin, a developer who’s found code reviews to be a slow process, especially after context switching or juggling different projects and languages. Even reviewing my own code can be tough when I’ve lost the thread or just need a fresh perspective. Over the past few weekends, I built GitReviewed to make PR reviews faster, smarter, and genuinely useful for real teams. What it does: - Reviews any GitHub or GitLab pull/merge request with AI-powered comments, spotting security issues, code patterns, typos, and more - Posts comments as you (not a bot), so feedback fits naturally…
2025 · gitreviewed.com · its alternatives →
- 12CA
I've long had a dislike for leetcode interviews on both sides of the coin. Project-based interviews can also be challenging because it can end up filtering out folks who don't want to spend several hours building something in their free time. I met up with a friend last year -- a very senior dev -- who had taken some time off to study leetcode exercises while preparing for FAANG interviews. It struck me that one of the key measures of whether a candidate is a fit for a team is rather synthetic. CodeRev.app is a simple, lightweight tool that helps teams evaluate candidates using code reviews.…
2024 · coderev.app · its alternatives →
- 13
I built LlamaPReview to solve a common frustration: most AI code reviewers either require complex setup or don't truly understand project context. Key differentiators: 1. One-click installation through GitHub Marketplace - no configuration needed 2. Analyzes your entire codebase first to understand: - Project structure - Coding patterns - Naming conventions - Architecture decisions 3. Completely free with no usage limits 4. Fully automated PR reviews with zero human intervention required Technical implementation: - Built on top of llama-github (my open source project) - Focuses on deep code…
2024 · github.com · its alternatives →
- 14
BugLens▲9AI code reviewer for GitHub PRs — catches bugs instantly
Jun 2026 · buglens.app · its alternatives →
- 15
CodeReview▲13Your Personal AI Assistant for Code Review
2025 · codereview-delta.vercel.app · its alternatives →
- 16
CodeThreat▲104AI that spots real risks and keeps your code safe.
2023 · codethreat.com · its alternatives →
- 17
I got fed up with endless PR reviews and the constant fear of missing a security bug, so I built Shieldcode. What it does: - Scans new pull requests for bugs and vulnerabilities automatically - Comments directly on GitHub with clear, actionable feedback - Works out of the box with no complex setup required Next up: NPM VScan, which will check your npm dependencies on every push for vulnerabilities or malware. I’d love to hear your thoughts and feedback! https://shieldcode.space
2025 · shieldcode.space · its alternatives →
- 18
- 19
2014 · codereview.io · its alternatives →
- 20
I built a GitHub app that detects it in pull requests, notifies or blocks them. Alongside it, I published a Semgrep ruleset for any stage of the CI/CD. I started this after getting frustrated by all the FUD around malicious code - lots of noise, little effort to solve it. Having said that, it's still a major attack vector - a stored RCE, with the codebase itself as the sink. Feedback is appreciated. The app, PRevent - https://github.com/apiiro/PRevent The ruleset: https://github.com/apiiro/malicious-code-ruleset The research:…
2025 · github.com · its alternatives →
- 21
Octopus reviews every pull request in minutes with AI. Works with GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. Indexes your codebase, analyzes diffs, and posts severity-rated findings to catch bugs before they merge.
Mar 2026 · octopus-review.ai · its alternatives →
- 22IB
I've been using Claude Code heavily, and kept hitting the same issue: the agent would push changes, respond to reviews, wait for CI... but never really know when it was done. It would poll CI in loops. Miss actionable comments buried among 15 CodeRabbit suggestions. Or declare victory while threads were still unresolved. The core problem: no deterministic way for an agent to know a PR is ready to merge. So I built gtg (Good To Go). One command, one answer: $ gtg 123 OK PR #123: READY CI: success (5/5 passed) Threads: 3/3 resolved It aggregates CI status, classifies review comments…
Jan 2026 · dsifry.github.io · its alternatives →
- 23
- 24
fix bugs, make code faster, fix security problems
2025 · github.com · its alternatives →
Also compare
Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Prices were read from each product’s own site when checked and can change. Refine with your own description →