nowfound

AI · alternatives · 2026

24 alternatives to Llm-benchmark – Benchmarks LLM-optimized code across multiple providers

Contribute to thomasdavis/llm-benchmark development by creating an account on GitHub.

Below are 24 products that do a similar job, ranked by how close each is in meaning and then by launch-day votes.

  1. 1

    Find the local LLM that actually runs and performs best on your hardware. Ranked by real, recency-aware benchmarks, not parameter count. One command, run it instantly. - Andyyyy64/whichllm

    May 2026 · github.com · its alternatives →

  2. 2

    Hey Folks! I've been building an open source benchmark for measuring local LLM performance on your own hardware. The benchmarking tool is a CLI written on top of Llamafile to allow for portability across different hardware setups and operating systems. The website is a database of results from the benchmark, allowing you to explore the performance of different models and hardware configurations. Please give it a try! Any feedback and contribution is much appreciated. I'd love for this to serve as a helpful resource for the local AI community. For more check out: - Website:…

    2025 · localscore.ai · its alternatives →

  3. 3
    LLM Stats▲293

    I was overspending on GPT-4o. It was really hard to compare different models I could switch to, so I built this LLM comparison tool. It shows leaderboards, pricing, and performance data across 100+ LLMs (including all major providers and open-source models). Key features: - Live pricing comparisons - Benchmark Scores (MMLU, HumanEval, GPQA, etc.) - Context length vs cost analysis - Speed/throughput tests across providers - Quality vs price visualizations - Open source (all data verifiable) Try it out: https://llmstats.com I'd like to know your opinion :) Tech stack: Next.js,…

    Oct 2025 · llm-stats.com · its alternatives →

  4. 4AT

    I recently built a small open-source tool to benchmark different LLM API endpoints — including OpenAI, Claude, and self-hosted models (like llama.cpp). It runs a configurable number of test requests and reports two key metrics: • First-token latency (ms): How long it takes for the first token to appear • Output speed (tokens/sec): Overall output fluency Demo: https://llmapitest.com/ Code: https://github.com/qjr87/llm-api-test The goal is to provide a simple, visual, and reproducible way to evaluate performance across different LLM providers, including…

    2025 · llmapitest.com · its alternatives →

  5. 5

    Hi HN community, I have been working on benchmarking publicly available LLMs these past couple of weeks. More precisely, I am interested on the finetuning piece since a lot of businesses are starting to entertain the idea of self-hosting LLMs trained on their proprietary data rather than relying on third party APIs. To this point, I am tracking the following 4 pillars of evaluation that businesses are typically look into: - Performance - Time to train an LLM - Cost to train an LLM - Inference (throughput / latency / cost per token) For each LLM, my aim is to benchmark them for…

    2023 · github.com · its alternatives →

  6. 6

    Pick hardware and a model, and feel the real speed of a local LLM before you buy. Simulates tokens/sec and time-to-first-token from verified benchmarks for GPUs, Macs, and more.

    6d ago · llmspeed.dev · its alternatives →

  7. 7

    LLM benchmarking tool for task-specific metrics on your data

    2023 · github.com · its alternatives →

  8. 8UD

    Hey HN! I’m the founder of Unify, and we’ve just released our Model Hub, which provides a collection of LLM endpoints with live runtime benchmarks all plotted across time: https://unify.ai/hub A key finding is that static tabular runtime benchmarks for LLMs simply do not work. It’s necessary to take a time-series perspective, and plot the variations through time. We currently have 21 models provided by: Anyscale, Perplexity AI, Replicate, Together AI, OctoAI, Mistral AI and OpenAI, with more on the roadmap. We test across different regions (Asia, US, Europe), with varied…

    2024 · its alternatives →

  9. 9

    Min.js Style Compression of Tech Docs for LLM Context - marv1nnnnn/llm-min.txt

    2025 · github.com · its alternatives →

  10. 10

    I have been working in AI space for a while now, first at FAANG with ML since 2021, then with LLM in start-ups since early 2023. I think LLM Application development is extremely iterative, more so than any other types of development. This is because to improve an LLM application performance (accuracy, hallucinations, latency, cost), you need to try various combinations of LLM models, prompt templates (e.g., few-shot, chain-of-thought), prompt context with different RAG architecture, different agent architecture, and more. There are thousands of possible combinations and you need a process…

    2024 · github.com · its alternatives →

  11. 11

    Test-driven development for LLMs

    2023 · benchllm.com · its alternatives →

  12. 12

    Recently I've been working on making LLM evaluations fast by using bayesian optimization to select a sensible subset. Bayesian optimization is used because it’s good for exploration / exploitation of expensive black box (paraphrase, LLM). I would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions on this!

    2024 · github.com · its alternatives →

  13. 13

    G'day, HN! I'm one of the maintainers of `llm`. I've been working alongside a trusty group of contributors to bring this project to life, and we're now at a point where we're ready to share it with the world. Large language models (LLMs) are taking the computing world by storm due to their emergent abilities that allow them to perform a wide variety of tasks, including translation, summarization, code generation, and even some degree of reasoning. However, the ecosystem around LLMs is still in its infancy, and it can be difficult to get started with these models. `llm` is a one-stop shop for…

    2023 · github.com · its alternatives →

  14. 14

    A generic latency benchmarking library. Contribute to tylertreat/bench development by creating an account on GitHub.

    2015 · github.com · its alternatives →

  15. 15

    Measures the ability of various LLMs to navigate a fictional codebase via iterative directory tree expansion and observation. Each model's baseline ability is compared against combinations of various prompt engineering mods to quantify exactly how much they help or hinder the LLM. Interesting findings here: https://github.com/aiwebb/treenav-bench#interesting-findings

    2024 · github.com · its alternatives →

  16. 16

    The LLM Evaluation Framework. Contribute to confident-ai/deepeval development by creating an account on GitHub.

    2023 · github.com · its alternatives →

  17. 17

    Measure & Maximize Ollama LLM Performance Across Hardware

    2025 · llm.aidatatools.com · its alternatives →

  18. 18

    Fine-tuned code generation

    2024 · finecodex.com · its alternatives →

  19. 19IL

    LLM Application development is extremely iterative, more so than any other types of development. This is because in addition to all the activities involved in regular application development, we also need to make the LLM Application accurate and reduce hallucination. To improve performance, we need to trial and error various combinations of LLM models, prompt templates (e.g., few-shot, chain-of-thought), prompt context with different RAG architecture, try different agent architecture, and more. There are thousands of permutations to try. We need to be able to easily experiment with these…

    2024 · palico.ai · its alternatives →

  20. 20

    Benchmark local LLMs without living in the terminal.

    Aug 2026 · github.com · its alternatives →

  21. 21

    Hi HN! Stefan here from superglue and today I’d like to share a new benchmark we’ve just open sourced: an Agent-API Benchmark, in which we test how well LLMs handle APIs. We gave LLMs API documentation and asked them to write code that makes actual API calls. Things like "create a Stripe customer" or "send a Slack message". We're not testing if they can use SDKs; we're testing if they can write raw HTTP requests (with proper auth, headers, body formatting) that actually work when executed against real API endpoints and can extract relevant information from that response. tl:dr: LLMs suck at…

    2025 · github.com · its alternatives →

  22. 22

    An open source Next app template to monitor your AI apps

    2025 · github.com · its alternatives →

  23. 23

    *Motivation* Hi hackers, I'm Asif. I know we dislike premature standardization, but hear me out. LLM Application development is extremely iterative, more so than most other types of application development. We need a process that allows us to iterate faster. LLM Development is highly iterative due to the activities that come with regular software development, as well as the need to make the LLM Application accurate and reduce hallucination. To improve hallucination, we need to trial and error various combinations of LLM models, prompt templates (e.g., few-shot, chain-of-thought), prompt…

    2024 · github.com · its alternatives →

  24. 24

    Reproducible benchmarks for evaluating AI models

    Aug 2026 · github.com · its alternatives →

Also compare

Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Prices were read from each product’s own site when checked and can change. Refine with your own description →