Alternatives
Products that do what LLM structured outputs hurt performance, we built a model to fix it does
- 1BP
2024 · instill.tech
- 2IL
I have been working in AI space for a while now, first at FAANG with ML since 2021, then with LLM in start-ups since early 2023. I think LLM Application development is extremely iterative, more so than any other types of development. This is because to improve an LLM application performance (accuracy, hallucinations, latency, cost), you need to try various combinations of LLM models, prompt templates (e.g., few-shot, chain-of-thought), prompt context with different RAG architecture, different agent architecture, and more. There are thousands of possible combinations and you need a process…
2024 · github.com
- 3WB
2012 · lessneglect.com
- 4DM
2021 · github.com
- 5FG
We developed a new framework that enables flexible control of generated text in language models. By combining several models and/or system prompts in one mathematical formula, it lets you tweak your style and combine model outputs with ease. A handy tool for those working with LLMs, looking for more fine-grained control of stylistic output. More details in our paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.14479. Feedback and potential applications are welcome.
2023 · github.com
- 6WG
2019 · buildmymvp.com
- 7AN
When building workflows that rely on LLMs, we commonly use structured output for programmatic use cases like converting an invoice into rows or meeting transcripts into tickets or even complex PDFs into database entries. The model may return the schema you want, but with hallucinated values like `invoice_date` being off by 2 months or the transcript array ordered wrongly. The JSON is valid, but the values are not. Structured output today is a big part of using LLMs, especially when building deterministic workflows. Current structured output benchmarks (e.g., JSONSchemaBench) only validate…
Apr 2026 · interfaze.ai
- 8IL
LLM Application development is extremely iterative, more so than any other types of development. This is because in addition to all the activities involved in regular application development, we also need to make the LLM Application accurate and reduce hallucination. To improve performance, we need to trial and error various combinations of LLM models, prompt templates (e.g., few-shot, chain-of-thought), prompt context with different RAG architecture, try different agent architecture, and more. There are thousands of permutations to try. We need to be able to easily experiment with these…
2024 · palico.ai
- 9LA
I recently submitted another project for using LLMs to correct errors and improve formatting of OCRed documents which was well received. The low cost and high quality/speed of the latest "value tier" models from OpenAI and Anthropic have made it possible to get compelling results at a very reasonable price in that application. It occured to me that the same approach taken there (namely, splitting documents into chunks and sending each chunk through a chain of LLM prompts that each take the output of the previous prompt and apply an additional layer of processing) could be easily applied…
2024 · github.com
- 10VF
Jun 2026 · github.com
- 11WW
2021 · manning.com
- 12HC
Mar 2026 · high-snr.com
- 13FH
2023 · product.distoai.com
- 14SB
*Motivation* Hi hackers, I'm Asif. I know we dislike premature standardization, but hear me out. LLM Application development is extremely iterative, more so than most other types of application development. We need a process that allows us to iterate faster. LLM Development is highly iterative due to the activities that come with regular software development, as well as the need to make the LLM Application accurate and reduce hallucination. To improve hallucination, we need to trial and error various combinations of LLM models, prompt templates (e.g., few-shot, chain-of-thought), prompt…
2024 · github.com
- 15FL
Long-session LLM memory degradation (entropy) is the silent killer of complex coding projects. Models like Gemini, GPT-4, and Claude all suffer from it, leading to hallucinations and lost context. I've developed an open-source protocol that temporarily "fixes" this issue by structuring the dialogue. It's not the final architectural solution, but it’s a proven patch for developers working right now. Looking for feedback from the community on how we can solve this structurally. https://github.com/robertomisuraca-blip/LLM-Entropy-Fix-Prot...
Nov 2025 · github.com
- 16LB
2025 · github.com
- 17IV
2024 · python.useinstructor.com
- 18WT
Oct 2025 · interfaze.ai
- 19AA
Mar 2026 · github.com
- 20LF
Jan 2026 · tinytune.xyz
- 21AM
Sep 2025 · github.com
- 22AT
We kept shipping “simple” LLM features that were fluent-but-wrong. After too many postmortems we wrote down the failure patterns and added a small reasoning layer in front of the model. It’s model-agnostic, sits beside your existing stack, and you can implement it from a single PDF (MIT). What’s inside the PDF A problem map of 16 failure modes we kept hitting in real systems (OCR/layout drift, table-to-question mismatches, embedding≠meaning, pre-deploy collapse, etc.). Four lightweight gates you can add today: Knowledge-boundary canaries (empty/adversarial/known-fact probes).…
2025 · github.com
- 23WM
2019 · github.com
- 24AA
Apr 2026 · enterprise.factagora.com
Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →