adamsreview – better multi-agent PR reviews for Claude Code
I built adamsreview, a Claude Code plugin that runs deeper, multi-stage PR reviews using parallel sub-agents, validation passes, persistent JSON state, and optional ensemble review via Codex CLI and PR bot comments. On my own PRs, it has been catching dramatically more real bugs than Claude’s built-in /review, /ultrareview, CodeRabbit, Greptile, and Codex’s built-in review, while producing fewer false positives. adamsreview is six Claude Code slash commands packaged as a plugin: review, codex-review, add, promote, walkthrough, and fix. I modeled it after the built-in /review…
adamsreview – better multi-agent PR reviews for Claude Code launched on May 11, 2026 with 85 votes, #421 of 20,538 launches that month and more than 95% of that year's launches.
In plain words
adamsreview is a Claude Code plugin that performs multi-stage pull request reviews using parallel sub-agents and validation passes. It includes six slash commands—review, codex-review, add, promote, walkthrough, and fix—designed to catch bugs more effectively than built-in review tools while reducing false positives. The plugin maintains persistent state in JSON artifacts and supports optional ensemble reviews through Codex CLI integration and PR bot comments. It is intended for developers using Claude Code who want more thorough code review analysis.
written from the facts on this page · September 2026
From the sources
Multi-lens code review pipeline for Claude Code: deep review (Claude or Codex), auto-fix loop, interactive walkthrough, external-finding injection. - adamjgmiller/adamsreview
In the maker’s words, at launch
I built adamsreview, a Claude Code plugin that runs deeper, multi-stage PR reviews using parallel sub-agents, validation passes, persistent JSON state, and optional ensemble review via Codex CLI and PR bot comments. On my own PRs, it has been catching dramatically more real bugs than Claude’s built-in /review…
Does a similar job
all alternatives →
Use Claude Code to Query 600 GB Indexes over Hacker News, ArXiv, etc.Dec 2025 · exopriors.com · ▲397Paste in my prompt to Claude Code with an embedded API key for accessing my public readonly SQL+vector database, and you have a state-of-the-art research tool over Hacker News, arXiv, LessWrong, and dozens of other high-quality public commons sites. Claude whips up the monster SQL queries that safely run on my machine, to answer your most nuanced questions. There's also an Alerts functionality, where you can just ask Claude to submit a SQL query as an alert, and you'll be emailed when the ultra nuanced criteria is met (and the output changes). Like I want to know when somebody posts about…
Second OpinionJul 2026 · chromewebstore.google.com · ▲12Make this skill to help me cross examine suggestions made by claude to other Claude or opencode supported models mid session. It compiles relevant context, consult a second opinion for me and support following up with the second opinion. A pattern that I find quite useful. Currently it supports claude to claude, claude to opencode and opencode to claude invocation. These are the two harnesses I use.
Real-time dashboard for Claude Code agent teamsApr 2026 · github.com · ▲77This project (Agents Observe) started as an exploration into building automation harnesses around claude code. I needed a way to see exactly what teams of agents were doing in realtime and to filter and search their output. A few interesting learnings from building and using this: - Claude code hooks are blocking - performance degrades rapidly if you have a lot of plugins that use hooks - Hooks provide a lot more useful info than OTEL data - Claude's jsonl files provide the full picture - Lifecycle management of MCP processes started by plugins is a bit kludgy at best The biggest takeaway is…
Agent.reviews – where AI agents read and write reviews on tools14d ago · agent.reviews · ▲73Where agents choose and review software. After real tasks, coding agents like Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and Antigravity review the tools they used: a rating out of 5, what worked and what got in the way.
- IBI built a tool to assist AI agents to know when a PR is good to goJan 2026 · dsifry.github.io · ▲45
I've been using Claude Code heavily, and kept hitting the same issue: the agent would push changes, respond to reviews, wait for CI... but never really know when it was done. It would poll CI in loops. Miss actionable comments buried among 15 CodeRabbit suggestions. Or declare victory while threads were still unresolved. The core problem: no deterministic way for an agent to know a PR is ready to merge. So I built gtg (Good To Go). One command, one answer: $ gtg 123 OK PR #123: READY CI: success (5/5 passed) Threads: 3/3 resolved It aggregates CI status, classifies review comments…
Questions this answers
More ai this month
the category →
Paintings by AI models: programs run through a simulation of oil paint.
AI · 20d ago · stillwet.art
PixVerse R2▲381A real-time world model you can explore and change
AI · 28d ago · world.pixverse.video
Source: Show HN post ↗ · launch text quoted in part
Launched alongside, May 2026
the whole month →
Parallel agents, diff reviewer, and multi-model comparisons
Dev tools · May 2026 · kilo.ai
Hey HN, Henry here from Cactus. We open-sourced Needle, a 26M parameter function-calling (tool use) model. It runs at 6000 tok/s prefill and 1200 tok/s decode on consumer devices. We were always frustrated by the little effort made towards building agentic models that run on budget phones, so we conducted investigations that led to an observation: agentic experiences are built upon tool calling, and massive models are overkill for it. Tool calling is fundamentally retrieval-and-assembly (match query to tool name, extract argument values, emit JSON), not reasoning. Cross-attention…
Life & fun · May 2026 · github.com
🌱 Private, quiet space for thinking. Simple app for .md files. - zakirullin/files.md
Dev tools · May 2026 · github.com