nowfound

AI · April 25, 2026

LLMs consume 5.4x less mobile energy than ad-supported web search

The standard AI energy debate compares server-side LLM inference to a server-side Google query. I think this misses most of what actually happens on a mobile device during a real search session. I built a parametric model of the full end-to-end mobile search session: 4G/5G radio energy, SoC rendering cost for a 2.5MB page, programmatic advertising RTB auctions running in the background, and network transmission costs for both sides. Then compared it to an equivalent LLM session. Main finding across 10,000 Monte Carlo draws: on mobile, a standard LLM session uses on average 5.4x less…

LLMs consume 5.4x less mobile energy than ad-supported web search launched on April 25, 2026 with 19 votes, #1,013 of 21,248 launches that month and more than 90% of that year's launches.

Visit dupr.at ↗Alternativestop 5% of April 2026

In plain words

This is a parametric energy consumption model comparing mobile LLM sessions to ad-supported web search. It accounts for end-to-end mobile factors including 4G/5G radio energy, device rendering costs for typical web pages, programmatic advertising overhead, and network transmission. The analysis finds that LLM sessions consume approximately 5.4x less mobile battery energy than equivalent web searches, with programmatic ads contributing up to 41% of per-session device drain. The model is based on Monte Carlo simulations rather than empirical device testing and shows different results for Wi-Fi connections and reasoning models.

written from the facts on this page · September 2026

From the sources

By shifting the functional unit from server queries to full user sessions, this assessment demonstrates how generative AI bypasses the massive energy tax of the modern ad-supported web.

The dominant environmental narrative around generative AI treats each large language model (LLM) prompt as an energy-intensive event and compares it to a traditional web search query at the server level. This paper argues that such comparisons use the wrong functional unit. The relevant unit is not query-level computation, but task-level session electricity: the final operational electricity required to satisfy one user information need across the full service-delivery chain. We therefore conduct a screening-level Comparative Energy Lifecycle Assessment (CELCA) of two modalities for complex information-seeking tasks: direct standard-LLM synthesis and ad-supported web search. CELCA is used…from dupr.at

In the maker’s words, at launch

The standard AI energy debate compares server-side LLM inference to a server-side Google query. I think this misses most of what actually happens on a mobile device during a real search session. I built a parametric model of the full end-to-end mobile search session: 4G/5G radio energy, SoC rendering cost for a…

Does a similar job

all alternatives →
  • Why write code if the LLM can just do the thing? (web app experiment)Nov 2025 · github.com · ▲436

    I spent a few hours last weekend testing whether AI can replace code by executing directly. Built a contact manager where every HTTP request goes to an LLM with three tools: database (SQLite), webResponse (HTML/JSON/JS), and updateMemory (feedback). No routes, no controllers, no business logic. The AI designs schemas on first request, generates UIs from paths alone, and evolves based on natural language feedback. It works—forms submit, data persists, APIs return JSON—but it's catastrophically slow (30-60s per request), absurdly expensive ($0.05/request), and has zero UI…

  • LLM StatsOct 2025 · llm-stats.com · ▲293

    I was overspending on GPT-4o. It was really hard to compare different models I could switch to, so I built this LLM comparison tool. It shows leaderboards, pricing, and performance data across 100+ LLMs (including all major providers and open-source models). Key features: - Live pricing comparisons - Benchmark Scores (MMLU, HumanEval, GPQA, etc.) - Context length vs cost analysis - Speed/throughput tests across providers - Quality vs price visualizations - Open source (all data verifiable) Try it out: https://llmstats.com I'd like to know your opinion :) Tech stack: Next.js,…

  • I've built a locally running Perplexity clone2024 · github.com · ▲669

    The video demo runs a 7b Model on a normal gaming GPU. I think it already works quite well (accounting for the limited hardware power). :)

  • Humans vs LLMs2025 · aipageready.com · ▲138

    Hi HN, We just launched [AI Page Ready](https://aipageready.com) — a tool to check if your web pages are discoverable and understandable by AI tools like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. It runs 40+ checks across six areas: Discoverability & Crawlability, Structured Data & Semantics, Content Quality, Answer-Ready Formatting, Accessibility & Rendering, and Deep AI LLM-specific checks. Would love your feedback — especially if you work in eCommerce, SEO, content, SaaS, or are trying to get traffic from AI tools. (Also open to ideas on what else to add to the tool!)

  • LLM Pricing2024 · ailesson.io · ▲178

    LLMs price comparison tool developed and updated by LLM

  • RunAnywhere2025 · runanywhere.ai · ▲119

    Ollama but for mobile, with a cloud fallback

More ai this month

the category →
  • Video model that turns script into viral social media videos

    AI · 19d ago · spira.ai

  • The browser where Claude Code and Codex work beside you

    AI · 19d ago · rill.love

  • Kolibri is Aleph Alpha

    AI · 21d ago · tej.as

  • Paintings by AI models: programs run through a simulation of oil paint.

    AI · 22d ago · stillwet.art

  • Beam.win▲379

    Run AI agents on one Mac and use its windows on another

    AI · 6d ago · beam.win

  • Route requests to the right LLM for cost, latency & quality

    AI · 23d ago · fastrouter.ai

Source: Show HN post ↗ · launch text quoted in part

Launched alongside, April 2026

the whole month →
  • Brila▲1,364

    One-page websites from real Google Maps reviews

    AI · Apr 2026 · brila.ai

  • AG

    Thought the resources for GPU arch were lacking, so here we are

    Life & fun · Apr 2026 · jaso1024.com

  • Built a ~9M param LLM from scratch to understand how they actually work. Vanilla transformer, 60K synthetic conversations, ~130 lines of PyTorch. Trains in 5 min on a free Colab T4. The fish thinks the meaning of life is food. Fork it and swap the personality for your own character.

    AI · Apr 2026 · github.com

  • AI meeting notes: now bot-free, in ChatGPT & Claude + more

    AI · Apr 2026 · fathom.ai

  • I made a laptop stand out of solid concrete, in the style of brutalist architecture, with themes of urbex and urban decay

    Life & fun · Apr 2026 · sam-burns.com

  • With social media and now AI, its important to keep the indie web alive. There are many people who write frequently. Blogosphere tries to highlight them by fetching the recent posts from personal blogs across many categories. There are two versions: Minimal (HN-inspired, fast, static): https://text.blogosphere.app/ Non-minimal: https://blogosphere.app/ If you don't find your blog (or your favorite ones), please add them. I will review and approve it.

    AI · Apr 2026 · text.blogosphere.app