LMM for LLMs – A mental model for building LLM apps
I've been building agentic apps for some large Fortune 500 companies (T-Mobile, Twilio, etc.) and developed a mental model that serves as a practical guide in building agentic apps: separate the high-level agent specific logic from low-level platform capabilities. I call it the L-MM: the Logical Mental Model for LLM applications. This mental model has not only been tremendously helpful in building agents but also helping customers think about the development process - so when I am done with a consulting engagement they can move faster across the stack and enable engineers and platform teams…
What it does
In the maker’s words, at launch
I've been building agentic apps for some large Fortune 500 companies (T-Mobile, Twilio, etc.) and developed a mental model that serves as a practical guide in building agentic apps: separate the high-level agent specific logic from low-level platform capabilities. I call it the L-MM: the Logical Mental Model for LLM applications. This mental model has not only been tremendously helpful in building agents but also helping customers think about the development process - so when I am done with a consulting engagement they can move faster across the stack and enable engineers and platform teams to work concurrently without interference, boosting productivity. So what is the high-level logic vs. the low-level platform work? High-Level Logic (Agent & Task Specific) Tools and Environment - These are specific integrations and capabilities that allow agents to interact with external systems or APIs to perform real-world tasks. Examples include: Booking a table via OpenTable API Scheduling calendar events via Google Calendar or Microsoft Outlook Retrieving and updating data from CRM platforms like Salesforce Utilizing payment gateways to complete transactions Role and Instructions - Clearly defining an agent's persona, responsibilities, and explicit instructions is essential for predictable and coherent behavior. This includes: The "personality" of the agent (e.g., professional assistant) Explicit boundaries around task completion ("done criteria") Behavioral guidelines for handling unexpected inputs or situations Low-Level Logic (Common Platform Capabilities) Routing - Efficiently coordinating tasks between multiple specialized agents, ensuring seamless hand-offs and effective delegation: Implementing intelligent load balancing and dynamic agent selection based on task context Supporting retries, failover strategies, and fallback mechanisms Guardrails - Centralized mechanisms to safeguard interactions and ensure reliability and safety: Filtering or moderating sensitive or harmful content Real-time compliance checks for industry-specific regulations (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA) Threshold-based alerts and automated corrective actions to prevent misuse Access to LLMs - Providing robust and centralized access to multiple LLMs ensures high availability and scalability: Implementing smart retry logic with exponential backoff Centralized rate limiting and quota management to optimize usage Handling diverse LLM backends transparently (OpenAI, Cohere, local open-source models, etc.) Observability - Comprehensive visibility into system performance and interactions using industry-standard practices: W3C Trace Context compatible distributed tracing for clear visibility across requests Detailed logging and metrics collection (latency, throughput, error rates, token usage) Easy integration with popular observability platforms like Grafana, Prometheus, Datadog, and OpenTelemetry Why This Matters By adopting this structured mental model, teams can achieve clear separation of concerns, improving collaboration, reducing complexity, and accelerating the development of scalable, reliable, and safe agentic applications. I'm actively working on addressing challenges in this domain. If you're navigating similar problems or have insights to share, let's discuss further - i'll leave some links about the stack too if folks want it. High-level framework - https://openai.github.io/openai-agents-python/ Low-level infrastructure - https://github.com/katanemo/archgw
Does the same job
all alternatives →
- AGAiaiai.guide: Plain-English mental model for LLM apps, tools and agentsApr 2026 · aiaiai.guide · ▲7
I’ve been building LLM tooling for a small VC fund and found myself explaining the same mental model over and over to non-technical people around me: how a stateless LLM becomes a chatbot, how tool use works, what an agent is mechanically, and why context windows shape all of it. I never found a guide that covered that full chain at the level I wanted, so I wrote one. It’s nine short chapters, each building on the last. Deliberately simplified: the goal is a useful mental model, not a textbook. Feedback, corrections, and contributions welcome: github.com/ymyke/aiaiai
- LSLLMStack – Self-Hosted, Low-Code Platform to Build AI Experiences2023 · github.com · ▲7
LLMStack is a low-code platform that can be used to build LLM apps, chatbots and integrate AI experiences into existing products/workflows. It comes with everything out of the box that one needs to build LLM apps locally. It can also be used in a multi-tenant setting, making it available for everyone to use in an enterprise. Some highlights of the platform: - Chain multiple LLM models allowing for complex pipelines - Includes a vector database and necessary connectors to help enrich LLM responses with private data - App templates tailored to specific use cases to quickly build LLM apps…
- KAKnowing – an LLM tool built on concept hierarchies, not prompt-response2024 · ▲5
Hey HN! I've spent the past year full-time building Knowing, a tool for interacting with LLMs directly inside hierarchical structures instead of the usual prompt-response format. The idea started because I realized how much more intuitive it felt to build concept hierarchies continuously—no more endless copy-pasting or wondering how everything connects. The journey’s been a struggle. While I see huge potential in structuring AI interactions this way (writing books fast, planning projects, or organizing ideas), it’s been hard to pin down clear use cases in the market. I’m also working in near…
- MAModel-agnostic cognitive architecture for LLMsNov 2025 · github.com · ▲6
Hi HN, A couple weeks ago I shared an early version of a side project I’ve been tinkering with called Persistent Mind Model. I built it at home on an i7-10700K / 32GB RAM / RTX 3080 because I was curious whether an AI could keep a stable “mind” over time, that could "think" about it's own identity as an LLM, instead of resetting every session. After a lot more tinkering, I think the architecture is finally in a solid place. Basically, it saves everything the AI does, thoughts, decisions, updates as a chain of events in a local SQLite database. Because the “identity” is stored in…
More ai this month
the category →
I trained a 125M-parameter transformer to autocomplete piano performances in real time (~108 notes/sec on an iPhone 15). The idea is basically GitHub Copilot or Tabnine, except instead of prompting it with code, you prompt it by playing a few notes on a MIDI piano. The model then continues what you played, entirely on-device. The app is free if anyone wants to try it. Happy to answer questions about the model, training, Core ML, or the many things that didn't work.
AI · 17d ago · simedw.com
Astute▲585Automate your B2B brand going viral, with new media creators
AI · 18d ago · company-app.joinastute.com
Hey HN, Henry from Cactus here! We previously released Cactus Needle, a 14MB agentic LLM for tool call, device use, and structured extraction for phones, wearables, smart homes, small robots and microcontrollers. We got really great feedback here, and have now incorporated the suggestions to release Needle 2. The whole model is a single 14MB binary that runs a full session in 28MB of RAM; 45m parameters at 2bit compression. Needle hits 500 tokens/sec decode speed on a Raspberry Pi 5, sits between 400-1,500 tokens/sec on VR devices like Meta Quest 3S and Apple Vision Pro, and ranges…
AI · 26d ago · cactuscompute.com
Launched alongside, April 2025
the whole month →- IB
Hi everyone, I built PyXL — a hardware processor that executes a custom assembly generated from Python programs, without using a traditional interpreter or virtual machine. It compiles Python -> CPython Bytecode -> Instruction set designed for direct hardware execution. I’m sharing an early benchmark: a GPIO test where PyXL achieves a 480ns round-trip toggle — compared to 14-25 micro seconds on a MicroPython Pyboard - even though PyXL runs at a lower clock (100MHz vs. 168MHz). The design is stack-based, fully pipelined, and preserves Python's dynamic typing without static type restrictions.…
Dev tools · 2025 · runpyxl.com
- UC
Life & fun · 2025 · filiph.github.io
- IB
https://the-pocket.github.io/Tutorial-Codebase-Knowledge/
AI · 2025 · github.com
