Alternatives
Products that do what Click&Boom does
Science explained — every claim backed by a real DOI link.
- 1NI
Understanding scientific articles can be tough, even in your own field. Trying to comprehend articles from others? Good luck. Enter, Now I Get It! I made this app for curious people. Simply upload an article and after a few minutes you'll have an interactive web page showcasing the highlights. Generated pages are stored in the cloud and can be viewed from a gallery. Now I Get It! uses the best LLMs out there, which means the app will improve as AI improves. Free for now - it's capped at 20 articles per day so I don't burn cash. A few things I (and maybe you will) find interesting: * This is…
Feb 2026 · nowigetit.us
- 2AV
2017 · arxiv-vanity.com
- 3
- 4
- 5EE
heyo! Explainpaper lets you upload a research paper PDF. If you don't understand a formula or sentence, just highlight it and the tool explains it for you I built this a few weeks ago to help me read a neuroscience paper, and it works pretty well! I didn't fine-tune GPT-3, but I do take a lot of context from the paper and feed that into the prompt (not the whole paper). Ppl have uploaded AI, biology, economics, philosophy papers and even law documents. Works in Chinese, Japanese, Spanish, French and more as well!
2022 · explainpaper.com
- 6
Run a research agent with cited answers in a single API call
Jun 2026 · tabstack.ai
- 7
- 8
- 9IV
Hey HN! This has been my project for a few years now. I recently brought it back to life after taking a pause to focus on my studies. My goal with this project is to separate fluff from science when shopping for supplements. I am doing this in 3 steps: 1.) I index every supplement on the market (extract each ingredient, normalize by quantity) 2.) I index every research paper on supplementation (rank every claim by effect type and effect size) 3.) I link data between supplements and research papers Earlier last year, I took pause on a project because I've ran into a few issues: Legal: Shady…
Jan 2026 · pillser.com
- 10
- 11SS
2024 · simplescience.ai
- 12
- 13TA
2025 · references.mireklzicar.com
- 14IM
When I read papers, I have to jump between multiple tabs to find the dataset, code, videos, peer reviews, and so on. I tried to fix this with this project. It started as a project just for papers on arXiv, but after its initial success on Twitter (got like 1.9k views: the most I have gotten for a post), I have now expanded it to include other openly available papers from PubMed Central, bioRxiv, medRxiv, and eLife. These papers have been linked with their genes, proteins, diseases, drugs, clinical trials, 3D protein structures, code, and cited and similar papers. This project now has four…
Jul 2026 · tomesphere.com
- 15
- 16
- 17SP
Hi HN, Even though I do science, I struggle to understand papers in adjacent fields. So I built thetrecs.com to aggregate and serve simplified summaries of the newest papers in Cell/Nature/Science. By scrolling through thetrecs I've made new science more accessible to myself, and maybe to you too. Any feedback is of course welcome.
2024 · thetrecs.com
- 18
The AI research assistant that cites real sources honestly
Jun 2026 · github.com
- 19WC
I posted our project a few days ago in a thread about Vitamin D. We’ve made some UI improvements people might find interesting.
2022 · keywords.groundedai.company
- 20EA
2025 · explainarxiv.org
- 21UO
2014 · usefulscience.org
- 22
- 23
A read-only showcase of UpTrust
17d ago · science.uptrusthq.com
- 24AF
Hey HN! I've always found it hard to keep up with the latest AI research, so I built Arxiv Feed! https://arxiv-feed.vercel.app/ It's basically a feed of AI research papers + a one-liner explaining what problem its solving, etc. You can also click on any paper to get a TL;DR. Right now, I've only indexed a few hundred large language model papers, but will expand to indexing AI papers in other topics. Thinking of also adding a way for people to up-vote/down-vote papers. Would love to hear any thoughts/feedback! :D Thanks!
2023 · arxiv-feed.vercel.app
Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →