nowfound

Alternatives

Products that do what NiubiStar does

Next-Gen Secure GitHub Growth & Reputation Management Matrix

  1. 1

    Next-Gen Secure GitHub Growth & Reputation Management Matrix

    Jun 2026

  2. 2
    GitHub20k119

    Gain more GitHub stars and clients

    2023

  3. 3IM

    0github.com is a pull request viewer that color-codes every diff line/token by how much human attention it probably needs. Unlike PR-review bots, we try to flag not just by "is it a bug?" but by "is it worth a second look?" (examples: hard-coded secret, weird crypto mode, gnarly logic, ugly code). To try it, replace github.com with 0github.com in any pull-request URL. Under the hood, we split the PR into individual files, and for each file, we ask an LLM to annotate each line with a data structure that we parse into a colored heatmap. Examples:…

    Oct 2025 · 0github.com

  4. 4

    Agile project management inside GitHub.

    2015

  5. 5GT

    2018 · github.com

  6. 6
    Astral188

    Organize your GitHub stars with ease

    2014

  7. 7GN
  8. 8

    An elegant & powerful GitHub client for iOS

    2018

  9. 9
    GitItBack117

    See how your company stacks up against competitors on GitHub

    2017

  10. 10
    Frankly101

    A dashboard of issues and PRs across GitHub repositories.

    2016

  11. 11

    Twiter bot for daily Github trends

    2022

  12. 12GA

    Simon(sfarshid) and I spend a lot of time on GitHub. As data nerds we put together a quick tool to explore your repository’s data. How it works: - Data Loading: We use dlt to pull data (issues, PRs, commits, stars) from GitHub - Semantic Layer: Relta wraps the underlying dataset into a semantic layer so the LLM doesn’t hallucinate. - Text-to-SQL: A text-to-SQL agent transforms your plain-English question into a query using the semantic layer - Generative Charts: assistant-ui dynamically generates a chart based on the SQL query - Refinements: If the semantic layer can’t handle your question,…

    2024 · github.com

  13. 13

    Smart way to explore popular github repo

    2017

  14. 14

    Howdy all. I'm Zack :wave:. I've been thinking about the problem of misguided AI pull requests and figured I'd throw a possible solution out there for feedback. Basically, CleverCrow lets supporters give tokens to a GitHub repo (or set of issues in that repo) for the maintainers to use to build/fix stuff. The fun implementation challenges have been around implementing the pooling dynamics and keeping the maintainers in charge while the backers are motivated to support their work.

    Jun 2026 · clevercrow.io

  15. 15WG

    For the past month, we've been monitoring GitHub's public event stream to catch spam comments and fake stars. Today, the spammers are back. Go check out the damage! You can see the spam comments and which users are posting the spam in real time. Also, here's a post we wrote about how we set it up: https://www.trytrench.com/blog/preventing-spam-and-fake-star...

    2024 · play.trytrench.com

  16. 16NR

    I've been working on git-stars.org and created a "Newcomer Ranking" that I think does a better job of discovering new popular projects than GitHub Trending. While GitHub Trending often shows the same established repositories cycling through, my Newcomer Ranking specifically focuses on repositories that are both new AND gaining significant traction recently.

    Oct 2025 · git-stars.org

  17. 17

    Github Wrapped, connect GitHub, get your year in review

    Dec 2025 · github-wrapped.xyz

  18. 18

    Your open source journey stars here

    2025

  19. 19ED

    We've indexed 5M+ GitHub users and built a ranking system that goes beyond follower counts. The idea started from frustration: GitHub is terrible for discovery. You can't answer "who are the best Python developers in Berlin?" or "who identified transformer-based models before they blew up?" without scraping everything yourself. So we did. What we built: CodeRank score - a composite reputation signal across contributions, repository impact, and community influence Tastemaker score - did you star repos at 50 stars that now have 50,000? We track that Comparison Builder - allows users to build…

    Mar 2026 · coderank.me

  20. 20BA
  21. 21LO

    I created a leaderboard showcasing the top 1000 GitHub repositories based on the number of stars. With GitHub hosting over 100 million public repositories, this leaderboard highlights the top 0.001% in terms of the number of stars. Stars might not be the perfect metric for adoption—metrics like the number of monthly downloads could be more accurate—but this list still represents some of the most popular and influential projects in the open-source community. You can check out the leaderboard here: https://githublb.vercel.app/

    2024 · githublb.vercel.app

  22. 22SR

    Hey friends! We have built an app for getting insights about your favorite GitHub community using large language models. The app uses LLMs to analyze the GitHub profiles of users who have starred the repository, capturing key details like the topics they are interested in. It takes screenshots of the stargazer's GitHub webpage, extracts text using an OCR model, and extracts insights embedded in the extracted text using LLMs. This app is inspired by the “original” Stargazers app written by Spencer Kimball (CEO of CockroachDB). While the original app exclusively used the GitHub API, this…

    2023

  23. 23SB
  24. 24OM

    OSSCAR is a quarterly ranking of the fastest-growing open-source GitHub organizations. It's a joint project between Supabase and >commit, a VC focused on open-source. A few notes about the methodology: we focus on organization accounts (excluding personal accounts and forks), split them into two divisions by starting star count so smaller and larger ecosystems are evaluated among peers, measure growth across three signals (GitHub stars, contributors, and package downloads from npm, PyPI, and Cargo), normalize each signal within its division using a log–minmax transform, and combine the…

    Apr 2026 · osscar.dev

Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →