Alternatives
Products that do what WikiGlobe does
Browse and view Wikipedia articles on an interactive globe!
- 1WE
2025 · wikiexplore.org
- 2SW
2021 · static.wiki
- 3IM
2021 · modernwiki.app
- 4

- 5
Globe of History▲189Interactive 3D globe visualizing 6,000 years of history.
Nov 2025 · globeofhistory.com
- 6

- 7

- 8

- 9AE
Wiki Journey tracks your daily Wikipedia rabbit holes in a tree format. Available on Firefox and Chrome: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/wiki-journey/ https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/wiki-journey/lehenb... It's open source, feel free to contribute! https://github.com/demegire/wiki-journey
2024 · chromewebstore.google.com
- 10

- 11ET
2013 · github.com
- 12

- 13WA
Feb 2026 · xikipedia.org
- 14

- 15TA
2022 · observablehq.com
- 16

- 17

- 18AZ
I'm building a journal app in Kotlin Multiplatform and for this purpose I have created a zoomable timeline interface. This is a side-project where I reuse the timeline interface to display 4 million events imported from Wikipedia / Wikidata, scored using PageRank. There is more information on the about page. If you're interested in the stack: I use Kotlin Multiplatform extensively, with Compose Multiplatform for the UI, communicates with the backend using Kotlinx-RPC and behind the hood a simple Postgres database on a Hetzner machine.
Jul 2026 · app.everything.diena.co
- 19

- 20

- 21WA
Hey everyone! I built a little app for exploring Wikipedia. https://atlaslib.com/wikipedia You can tap on a suggestion or ask anything. Why? Wikipedia is awesome but search on Wikipedia unfortunately is not. I often use Google to search Wikipedia but I wondered if there is a more direct way. Some of the huge Wikipedia articles (e.g. animals, biology, history, health, science) are thorough but a bit dry. A language model like llama 3 70b helps with both: discovery and with making a dry topic more approachable. behind the scenes: - client: 150 lines vanilla javascript, tailwind…
2024 · atlaslib.com
- 22

- 23

- 24TR
2018 · thereaderwiki.com
Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →