Review My Manuscript
AI pre-review before you submit your scientific paper
Review My Manuscript launched on May 26, 2026 with 3 votes, #3,449 of 20,538 launches that month and more than 50% of that year's launches.
What it does
Review My Manuscript gives researchers a structured, referee-style pre-review in minutes—not a rewrite. Upload PDF/DOCX, get scores, methodology notes, literature context, and an action plan before journal submission. First review free; from $29. Journal-fit suggestions are included when our catalog matches your field.
Check my manuscript before journal submission. AI-assisted pre-review with reviewer-style feedback, literature-aware analysis, and submission guidance.
See methods, statistics, scientific contribution, and likely reviewer objections in minutes. Your files stay confidential and are removed after processing. Aligned with the upload flow: file prep, analysis, and output in one place. Add your main manuscript as PDF, DOCX, or ODT; upload tables and figures in separate slots. We parse them so tables and figures are reviewed distinctly in the report. RAG across PubMed, Crossref, and Semantic Scholar connects your study to current evidence and field context. Publication-readiness score, axis-based review, and a prioritised action plan — clear pre-submission feedback. Upload a revision and optionally add journal or referee comments so the analysis…from reviewmymanuscript.com
Does a similar job
all alternatives →
AI Peer Reviewer – Multiagent system for scientific manuscript analysis2025 · github.com · ▲108After waiting 8 months for a journal response or two months for co-author feedback that consisted of "looks good" and a single comma change, we built an AI-powered peer review system that helps researchers improve their manuscripts rapidly before submission. The system uses multiple specialized agents to analyze different aspects of scientific papers, from methodology to writing quality. Key features: 24 specialized agents analyzing sections, scientific rigor, and writing quality // Detailed feedback with actionable recommendations. // PDF report generation. //…
Manuscript AI2025 · manuscriptai.co · ▲4AI-powered in-depth Analysis of your book in minutes for $49
- LYLast year I asked HN to do it, now I am doing it myself-JournalClub iPad2011 · ▲13
Almost one year ago I asked HN if anybody is interested to make a Web app to make reading and finding scientific papers smarter [http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1664648]. No one did, at least no one did what "I" think is the best way to approach this problem. A a few month ago I decided to do it myself.<p>Meet JournalClub iPad app (absolutely free), http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/journalclub/id443819334? I have a recommendation engine in the pipeline that I would introduce in the next update (hopefully in a month or so). I really appreciate any comments, feedbacks.
More ai this month
the category →
Paintings by AI models: programs run through a simulation of oil paint.
AI · 22d ago · stillwet.art
FastRouter.ai▲364Route requests to the right LLM for cost, latency & quality
AI · 23d ago · fastrouter.ai
Source: Product Hunt launch ↗
Launched alongside, May 2026
the whole month →
Parallel agents, diff reviewer, and multi-model comparisons
Dev tools · May 2026 · kilo.ai
Hey HN, Henry here from Cactus. We open-sourced Needle, a 26M parameter function-calling (tool use) model. It runs at 6000 tok/s prefill and 1200 tok/s decode on consumer devices. We were always frustrated by the little effort made towards building agentic models that run on budget phones, so we conducted investigations that led to an observation: agentic experiences are built upon tool calling, and massive models are overkill for it. Tool calling is fundamentally retrieval-and-assembly (match query to tool name, extract argument values, emit JSON), not reasoning. Cross-attention…
Life & fun · May 2026 · github.com
🌱 Private, quiet space for thinking. Simple app for .md files. - zakirullin/files.md
Dev tools · May 2026 · github.com