Alternatives
Products that do what Deriving Hubble's constant from fundamental constants does
- 1LN
I was reviewing Dirac's Large Numbers Hypothesis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_large_numbers_hypothesis) and decided to give it a second go, now with measurements of fundamental constants more precise than 100 years ago. And I stumbled upon a value for Hubble's constant that's uncannily close. Here are the full calculations. https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1K1qoUFvqZp1fWbpcKJWq63nflgwS0ZHh?usp=sharing Meaningless, or meaningful coincidence?
2021
- 2RA
2021 · ramp-book.com
- 3HO
2018 · thehappykoala.github.io
- 4HU
2014 · domitable.com
- 53M
2021 · github.com
- 6PA
2014 · montepie.herokuapp.com
- 7

- 8AM
2018 · lambdaway.free.fr
- 9ED
2019 · exoplanetexplore.now.sh
- 10FP
2021 · floptimal.com
- 11AM
2012 · github.com
- 12VM
2020 · topovis.iambeef.com
- 13DV
2019 · github.com
- 14BH
2015 · github.com
- 15IW
I was playing around with fundamental constants and out popped 13.8 billion light years. What is going on? the wavelength of an electron mass photon / (2pi) * the charge radius of a proton / the black hole radius of a proton = 13.8 billion light years ((h / (m_e * c * 2pi)) * (h / (m_p * c * pi/2)) / (2G * m_p / c^2)) = 13.8 billion light years…
2021
- 16LL
2014 · github.com
- 17TS
2016 · dataviztalk.blogspot.com
- 18NVNuesbyte v2▲46
2013 · nuesbyte.com
- 19SG
2019 · sphere.erdos.dev
- 20AI
2017 · trie.now.sh
- 21WL
2016 · whitestormjs.xyz
- 22SF
2021 · github.com
- 23TZ
2017 · gpestana.gitbooks.io
- 24RF
2013 · jonls.dk
Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →