AI · alternatives · 2026

24 alternatives to LLM Deceptiveness and Gullibility Benchmark

Benchmark evaluating LLMs on their ability to create and resist disinformation. Includes comprehensive testing across major models (Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, Llama, etc.) with standardized evaluation metrics. - lechmazur/deception

Below are 24 products that do a similar job, ranked by how close each is in meaning and then by launch-day votes. LLM Deceptiveness and Gullibility Benchmark launched in 2024; newer entries below may have overtaken it.

1
LLM Stats▲293
I was overspending on GPT-4o. It was really hard to compare different models I could switch to, so I built this LLM comparison tool. It shows leaderboards, pricing, and performance data across 100+ LLMs (including all major providers and open-source models). Key features: - Live pricing comparisons - Benchmark Scores (MMLU, HumanEval, GPQA, etc.) - Context length vs cost analysis - Speed/throughput tests across providers - Quality vs price visualizations - Open source (all data verifiable) Try it out: https://llmstats.com I'd like to know your opinion :) Tech stack: Next.js,…
Oct 2025 · llm-stats.com · its alternatives →
2AT
A tool to benchmark LLM APIs (OpenAI, Claude, local/self-hosted)▲55
I recently built a small open-source tool to benchmark different LLM API endpoints — including OpenAI, Claude, and self-hosted models (like llama.cpp). It runs a configurable number of test requests and reports two key metrics: • First-token latency (ms): How long it takes for the first token to appear • Output speed (tokens/sec): Overall output fluency Demo: https://llmapitest.com/ Code: https://github.com/qjr87/llm-api-test The goal is to provide a simple, visual, and reproducible way to evaluate performance across different LLM providers, including…
2025 · llmapitest.com · its alternatives →
3
Find the best local LLM for your hardware, ranked by benchmarks▲283
Find the local LLM that actually runs and performs best on your hardware. Ranked by real, recency-aware benchmarks, not parameter count. One command, run it instantly. - Andyyyy64/whichllm
May 2026 · github.com · its alternatives →
4
BenchLLM by V7▲133
Test-driven development for LLMs
2023 · benchllm.com · its alternatives →
5
LocalScore – Local LLM Benchmark▲124
Hey Folks! I've been building an open source benchmark for measuring local LLM performance on your own hardware. The benchmarking tool is a CLI written on top of Llamafile to allow for portability across different hardware setups and operating systems. The website is a database of results from the benchmark, allowing you to explore the performance of different models and hardware configurations. Please give it a try! Any feedback and contribution is much appreciated. I'd love for this to serve as a helpful resource for the local AI community. For more check out: - Website:…
2025 · localscore.ai · its alternatives →
6
LLM Debate Benchmark▲9
Adversarial multi-turn benchmark for LLM debate quality, using side-swapped matchups and multi-model judging to rank models by judged debate performance. - lechmazur/debate
Mar 2026 · github.com · its alternatives →
7
LLM Verified with Monte Carlo Tree Search▲102
This is a weekend hack that I'd like to further develop as it's working surprisingly well. Using MCTS, we can explore a space of possible verified programs with an LLM. We check the partial programs at each step, and so steer towards programs that pass the verifier. https://github.com/namin/llm-verified-with-monte-carlo-tree-...
2023 · github.com · its alternatives →
8
Open-source model and scorecard for measuring hallucinations in LLMs▲65
Hi all! This morning, we released a new Apache 2.0 licensed model on HuggingFace for detecting hallucinations in retrieval augmented generation (RAG) systems. What we've found is that even when given a "simple" instruction like "summarize the following news article," every LLM that's available hallucinates to some extent, making up details that never existed in the source article -- and some of them quite a bit. As a RAG provider and proponents of ethical AI, we want to see LLMs get better at this. We've published an open source model, a blog more thoroughly describing our methodology (and…
2023 · vectara.com · its alternatives →
9UD
Unify – Dynamic LLM Benchmarks and SSO for Multi-Vendor Deployment▲91
Hey HN! I’m the founder of Unify, and we’ve just released our Model Hub, which provides a collection of LLM endpoints with live runtime benchmarks all plotted across time: https://unify.ai/hub A key finding is that static tabular runtime benchmarks for LLMs simply do not work. It’s necessary to take a time-series perspective, and plot the variations through time. We currently have 21 models provided by: Anyscale, Perplexity AI, Replicate, Together AI, OctoAI, Mistral AI and OpenAI, with more on the roadmap. We test across different regions (Asia, US, Europe), with varied…
2024 · its alternatives →
10
LLM Thematic Generalization Benchmark▲6
Thematic Generalization Benchmark: measures how effectively various LLMs can infer a narrow or specific "theme" (category/rule) from a small set of examples and anti-examples, then detect which item truly fits that theme among a collection of misleading candidates. - lechmazur/generalization
2025 · github.com · its alternatives →
11
Deepmark AI▲97
LLM benchmarking tool for task-specific metrics on your data
2023 · github.com · its alternatives →
12
finetune LLMs via the Finetuning Hub▲80
Hi HN community, I have been working on benchmarking publicly available LLMs these past couple of weeks. More precisely, I am interested on the finetuning piece since a lot of businesses are starting to entertain the idea of self-hosting LLMs trained on their proprietary data rather than relying on third party APIs. To this point, I am tracking the following 4 pillars of evaluation that businesses are typically look into: - Performance - Time to train an LLM - Cost to train an LLM - Inference (throughput / latency / cost per token) For each LLM, my aim is to benchmark them for…
2023 · github.com · its alternatives →
13
A new benchmark for testing LLMs for deterministic outputs▲60
When building workflows that rely on LLMs, we commonly use structured output for programmatic use cases like converting an invoice into rows or meeting transcripts into tickets or even complex PDFs into database entries. The model may return the schema you want, but with hallucinated values like `invoice_date` being off by 2 months or the transcript array ordered wrongly. The JSON is valid, but the values are not. Structured output today is a big part of using LLMs, especially when building deterministic workflows. Current structured output benchmarks (e.g., JSONSchemaBench) only validate…
Apr 2026 · interfaze.ai · its alternatives →
14
Cheddar-bench – unsupervised benchmark for coding agents▲9
I built a small benchmark to test CLI coding agents on blind bug detection. A challenger agent injects bugs and writes ground truth (`bugs.json`). A different reviewer agent audits the repo without seeing ground truth, and an LLM matcher scores bug-to-finding assignments. Current run: 50 repos, 150 challenges, 450 reviews, 2,603 injected bugs. Weighted detection: Claude 58.05%, Codex 37.84%, Gemini 27.81%. LLM-judge benchmarks are easy to get wrong, so I’d really appreciate critical feedback on benchmark fairness, scoring/matching methodology, and obvious failure modes I’m missing. Full…
Feb 2026 · github.com · its alternatives →
15
Open LLM Benchmark▲1
Reproducible benchmarks for evaluating AI models
Aug 2026 · github.com · its alternatives →
16
I implemented evals metrics for LLMs that runs locally on your machine▲22
The LLM Evaluation Framework. Contribute to confident-ai/deepeval development by creating an account on GitHub.
2023 · github.com · its alternatives →
17NL
New LLM outperforming GPT-3.5▲6
Refuel LLM (84.2%) outperforms trained human annotators (80.4%), GPT-3-5-turbo (81.3%), PaLM-2 (82.3%) and Claude (79.3%) across a benchmark of 15 text labeling datasets. It is a Llama-v2-13b base model, trained on over 2500 unique datasets (5.24B tokens) spanning categories such as classification, entity resolution, matching, reading comprehension and information extraction. Here is the interactive demo: https://labs.refuel.ai/playground. Pretty fun to play with!
2023 · its alternatives →
18PP
Pencil Puzzle Bench – LLM Benchmark for Multi-Step Verifiable Reasoning▲5
I've been working on applying LLMs to long-context, verifiable problems over the past year, and today I'm releasing a benchmark of 62,000 pencil puzzles across 94 types (sudoku, nonori, slitherlink, etc.). The benchmark also allows for intermediate checks /rule breaks for all varieties at any step. I tested 51 models against a subset (300 puzzles) in two modes: single-shot (output the full solution) and agentic (iterate with verifier feedback). Some results: - Best model (GPT 5.2@xhigh) solves 56%. (~ half the puzzles are unsolved by any model) - Agentic solves average 29 turns. The…
Mar 2026 · ppbench.com · its alternatives →
19
Alconost.MT/Evaluate▲49
Annotate translation errors, score quality, get PDF reports
2025 · alconost.mt · its alternatives →
20AL
An LLM purpose built for data annotation, outperforms GPT-3.5▲9
Try it out here: https://labs.refuel.ai/playground Refuel LLM (84.2%) outperforms trained human annotators (80.4%), GPT-3-5-turbo (81.3%), PaLM-2 (82.3%) and Claude (79.3%) across a benchmark of 15 text labeling datasets. It is a Llama-v2-13b base model, trained on over 2500 unique datasets (5.24B tokens) spanning categories such as classification, entity resolution, matching, reading comprehension and information extraction.
2023 · its alternatives →
21
LLM Tree Navigation Benchmark▲6
Measures the ability of various LLMs to navigate a fictional codebase via iterative directory tree expansion and observation. Each model's baseline ability is compared against combinations of various prompt engineering mods to quantify exactly how much they help or hinder the LLM. Interesting findings here: https://github.com/aiwebb/treenav-bench#interesting-findings
2024 · github.com · its alternatives →
22
RagMetrics▲13
We built live AI evaluation to detect hallucinations, grounding issues, and drift as outputs are generated. This helps teams move GenAI from pilots into production.
2025 · ragmetrics.ai · its alternatives →
23
LLM Playground, compare results side by side▲14
Test and compare results from Large Language Models (LLMs) simultaneously, including Anthropic's Claude 1.2, OpenAI's GPT-4, GPT-3.5 turbo, and Cohere's CommandXL Nightly. Analyze the results side-by-side in a single UI on top of LLM APIs.
2023 · retool.com · its alternatives →
24
DeepEval – Evaluation and Unit Testing for LLMs▲18
The LLM Evaluation Framework. Contribute to confident-ai/deepeval development by creating an account on GitHub.
2023 · github.com · its alternatives →

Also compare

Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Prices were read from each product’s own site when checked and can change. Refine with your own description →