Alternatives
Products that do what LLM Eval Suite does
Structured evaluation of Apple Foundation Models on macOS
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6CL
Hi HN! Run it: OPENROUTER_API_KEY="sk" npx bff-eval --demo We built a tool to help people take LLM outputs and easily grade them / eval them to know how good an assistant response is. We've built a number of LLM apps, and while we could ship decent tech demos, we were disappointed with how they'd perform over time. We worked with a few companies who had the same problem, and found out scientifically building prompts and evals is far from a solved problem... writing these things feels more like directing a play than coding. Inspired by Anthropic's constitutional ai concepts, and amazing…
2025 · github.com
- 7II
2023 · github.com
- 8AT
I recently built a small open-source tool to benchmark different LLM API endpoints — including OpenAI, Claude, and self-hosted models (like llama.cpp). It runs a configurable number of test requests and reports two key metrics: • First-token latency (ms): How long it takes for the first token to appear • Output speed (tokens/sec): Overall output fluency Demo: https://llmapitest.com/ Code: https://github.com/qjr87/llm-api-test The goal is to provide a simple, visual, and reproducible way to evaluate performance across different LLM providers, including…
2025 · llmapitest.com
- 9
- 10
Aggregate uptime monitoring across OpenAI, Claude, and more
Apr 2026 · tools.lamatic.ai
- 11PH
Hey HN, Hakim here from Fini (YC S22), a startup focused on providing automated customer support bots for enterprises that have a high volume of support requests. Today, one of the largest use cases of LLMs is for the purpose of automating support. As the space has evolved over the past year, there has subsequently been a need for evaluations of LLM outputs - and a sea of LLM Evals packages have been released. "LLM evals" refer to the evaluation of large language models, assessing how well these AI systems understand and generate human-like text. These packages have recently relied on…
2024 · github.com
- 12
- 13OA
Hey HN! I'm Caleb, one of the contributors to Opik, a new open source framework for LLM evaluations. Over the last few months, my colleagues and I have been working on a project to solve what we see as the most painful parts of writing evals for an LLM application. For this initial release, we've focused on a few core features that we think are the most essential: - Simplifying the implementation of more complex LLM-based evaluation metrics, like Hallucination and Moderation. - Enabling step-by-step tracking, such that you can test and debug each individual component of your LLM application,…
2024 · github.com
- 14
- 15IL
I have been working in AI space for a while now, first at FAANG with ML since 2021, then with LLM in start-ups since early 2023. I think LLM Application development is extremely iterative, more so than any other types of development. This is because to improve an LLM application performance (accuracy, hallucinations, latency, cost), you need to try various combinations of LLM models, prompt templates (e.g., few-shot, chain-of-thought), prompt context with different RAG architecture, different agent architecture, and more. There are thousands of possible combinations and you need a process…
2024 · github.com
- 16AN
When building workflows that rely on LLMs, we commonly use structured output for programmatic use cases like converting an invoice into rows or meeting transcripts into tickets or even complex PDFs into database entries. The model may return the schema you want, but with hallucinated values like `invoice_date` being off by 2 months or the transcript array ordered wrongly. The JSON is valid, but the values are not. Structured output today is a big part of using LLMs, especially when building deterministic workflows. Current structured output benchmarks (e.g., JSONSchemaBench) only validate…
Apr 2026 · interfaze.ai
- 17DE
2023 · github.com
- 18DA
2023 · github.com
- 19SO
We built SwiftAI, an open-source Swift library that lets you use Apple’s on-device LLMs when available (Apple opened access in June), and fall back to a cloud model when they aren’t available — all without duplicating code. SwiftAI gives you: - A single, model-agnostic API - An agent/tool loop - Strongly-typed structured outputs - Optional chat state Backstory: We started experimenting with Apple’s local models because they’re free (no API calls), private, and work offline. The problem: not all devices support them (older iPhones, Apple Intelligence disabled, low battery, etc.). That…
2025 · github.com
- 20MG
Hello HN, I've been working on this project for a while, and it has been in an "open" beta for some time. I finally believe it's ready for its first release. I hope you like it. Here are some potential questions that may arise: 1. How does it compare to LM Studio? It's likely that if you're already using LM Studio, you'll continue to do so. This project is designed to be more user-friendly. 2. Is it open-source? No, it is not. 3. Does it use any open-source libraries? Yes, it uses llama.cpp and a few others, as indicated in the license information included with the application. 4. Why is not…
2023 · avapls.com
- 21WW
Hey all! @sridatta and I wrote a book/zine called Forest Friends on system evals for LLM-driven apps. But it's a bit more whimsical, a bit more visual, and very much inspired by the meme of LLMs being a shoggoth polished into a smiley face with RLHF. LLM system evals are important as companies move past the flashy AI demos to reliable production apps. System evals keep coming up as the answer for what you "should do", but it's not exactly a standard part of the software engineering toolkit. So we pulled from @sridatta's seven years as a research engineer at Google, plus a ton of best…
2024
- 22CF
Jan 2026 · github.com
- 23SE
Hey HN! I built self-driving sim and eval at Waymo. Now I’m building Scorecard to bring that approach to agent eval: reproducible, automated scoring for AI. Scorecard lets you: - Run LLM-as-judge evals on agent workflows: test tool usage, multi-step reasoning, and task completion in CI/CD or in a playground. - Debug failures with OpenTelemetry traces: see which tool failed, why your agent looped, and where reasoning went wrong. - Collaborate on datasets, simulated agents, and evaluation metrics. Try it out → https://app.scorecard.io (free tier, no payment required!) Docs →…
Oct 2025 · docs.scorecard.io
- 24CL
We're excited to launch compliant-llm: an open-source toolkit that helps infosec and compliance teams audit AI agents against regulatory frameworks like NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, and OWASP Top 10. Infosec and compliance teams are now responsible for tracking security and compliance risks of a growing number of AI agents across external and internal apps and third-party vendors. compliant-llm gives you a way to: - Define and run comprehensive red-teaming tests for AI agents - Maps test outcomes to compliance frameworks like NIST AI RMF - Generate detailed audit logs and documentation -…
2025 · github.com
Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →