Alternatives
Products that do what Mini-swe-agent achieves 65% on SWE-bench in 100 lines of python does
- 1SS
2025 · github.com
- 2PT
2014 · github.com
- 3AA
2018 · github.com
- 4AP
2014 · github.com
- 5JA
2012 · madlag.github.com
- 6FB
2019 · fastapi.tiangolo.com
- 7SA
2017 · github.com
- 8IW
2017 · icepy.readthedocs.io
- 9AA
2025 · ashenfad.github.io
- 10MP
2020 · github.com
- 11IC
2015 · github.com
- 12AM
2020 · gist.github.com
- 13AR
If you're interested in exploring what LLM-based agent systems these days actually do to solve certain benchmarks such as SWEBench or WebArena, we created a small leaderboard with our team, that allows to view a lot of public and OSS agent results including all the runtime traces (the step-by-step reasoning behind the scenes). Looking at traces is actually quite interesting, as they reveal a lot about the inner working and shortcomings of current agent system, e.g. see https://explorer.invariantlabs.ai/u/invariant/webarena--SteP... for an example trace.
2024 · explorer.invariantlabs.ai
- 14LA
2015 · github.com
- 15AA
Mar 2026 · github.com
- 16RS
What if your agent uses a different LM at every turn? We let mini-SWE-agent randomly switch between GPT-5 and Sonnet 4 and it scored higher on SWE-bench than with either model separately. GPT-5 by itself gets 65.0%, Sonnet 4 64.8%, but randomly switching at every step gets us 67.2% This result came pretty surprising to us. There's a few more experiments in the blog post.
2025 · swebench.com
- 17OS
May 2026 · 49agents.com
- 18MD
We’re excited to share ML-Dev-Bench, a new open-source benchmark that tests AI agents on real-world ML development tasks. Unlike typical coding challenges or Kaggle-style competitions, our benchmark simulates end-to-end ML workflows including: - Dataset handling and preprocessing - Debugging model and code failures - Implementing new model architectures - Fine-tuning and improving existing models With 30 diverse tasks, ML-Dev-Bench evaluates agents across critical stages of ML development. To complement this, we built Calipers, a framework that provides systematic performance evaluation and…
2025 · github.com
- 19FM
2020 · github.com
- 20MA
2020 · github.com
- 21OA
Nov 2025 · github.com
- 22ST
2020 · github.com
- 23MR
2024 · github.com
- 24LA
We combined Stanford's ACE (agents learning from execution feedback) with the Reflective Language Model pattern. Instead of reading traces in a single pass, an LLM writes and runs Python in a sandbox to programmatically explore them - finding cross-trace patterns that single-pass analysis misses. The framework achieved 2x consistency improvement on τ2-bench.
Mar 2026 · github.com
Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →