Alternatives
Products that do what TRI·TFM v3.0 Framework does
Deterministic, LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation framework.
- 1OS
Hi all! This morning, we released a new Apache 2.0 licensed model on HuggingFace for detecting hallucinations in retrieval augmented generation (RAG) systems. What we've found is that even when given a "simple" instruction like "summarize the following news article," every LLM that's available hallucinates to some extent, making up details that never existed in the source article -- and some of them quite a bit. As a RAG provider and proponents of ethical AI, we want to see LLMs get better at this. We've published an open source model, a blog more thoroughly describing our methodology (and…
2023 · vectara.com
- 2L3
I spent a lot of time and money on this rather big side project of mine that attempts to replicate the mechanistic interpretability research on proprietary LLMs that was quite popular this year and produced great research papers by Anthropic [1], OpenAI [2] and Deepmind [3]. I am quite proud of this project and since I consider myself the target audience for HackerNews did I think that maybe some of you would appreciate this open research replication as well. Happy to answer any questions or face any feedback. Cheers [1]…
2024 · github.com
- 3

- 4DA
I've built an advanced RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) pipeline from scratch to demystify the complex mechanics of modern LLM-powered Question Answering systems. This repository features: -- An implementation of a sub-question query engine from scratch to answer complex user questions. -- Illustrative explanations that unveil the inner workings of the system. -- An analysis of the challenges I faced while working with the system, like prompt engineering and cost estimation. -- Qualitative comparison with similar frameworks like LlamaIndex, offering a broader perspective. Key Takeaway:…
2023 · github.com
- 5FG
We developed a new framework that enables flexible control of generated text in language models. By combining several models and/or system prompts in one mathematical formula, it lets you tweak your style and combine model outputs with ease. A handy tool for those working with LLMs, looking for more fine-grained control of stylistic output. More details in our paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.14479. Feedback and potential applications are welcome.
2023 · github.com
- 6CA
Hi HN! We’re been working hard on this low-code tool for rapid prompt discovery, robustness testing and LLM evaluation. We’ve just released documentation to help new users learn how to use it and what it can already do. Let us know what you think! :)
2023 · chainforge.ai
- 7OA
Hey HN! I'm Caleb, one of the contributors to Opik, a new open source framework for LLM evaluations. Over the last few months, my colleagues and I have been working on a project to solve what we see as the most painful parts of writing evals for an LLM application. For this initial release, we've focused on a few core features that we think are the most essential: - Simplifying the implementation of more complex LLM-based evaluation metrics, like Hallucination and Moderation. - Enabling step-by-step tracking, such that you can test and debug each individual component of your LLM application,…
2024 · github.com
- 8AN
When building workflows that rely on LLMs, we commonly use structured output for programmatic use cases like converting an invoice into rows or meeting transcripts into tickets or even complex PDFs into database entries. The model may return the schema you want, but with hallucinated values like `invoice_date` being off by 2 months or the transcript array ordered wrongly. The JSON is valid, but the values are not. Structured output today is a big part of using LLMs, especially when building deterministic workflows. Current structured output benchmarks (e.g., JSONSchemaBench) only validate…
Apr 2026 · interfaze.ai
- 9A1
I've seen a lot of comments about how complex frameworks like LangChain can be. Over the holidays, I wanted to see how minimal an LLM framework could get if we stripped away everything non-essential. The result is an LLM framework in just 100 lines of code. These 100 lines capture what I see as the core abstraction of most LLM frameworks: a nested directed graph that breaks down tasks into multiple LLM steps, with branching and recursion to enable agent-like decision-making. From there, you can layer on more advanced features like agents, RAG, task decomposition, and more. I’ve intentionally…
2025 · github.com
- 10LS
Hi, I was a corporate lawyer for many years working with a lot of financial services and insurance companies. In practicing law, I noticed there was a lot of repetition in the tasks I was working on even as a highly paid attorney that could be automated. I wanted to solve the problem of dealing with a lot information and data in a practical way, using AI. This motivated me to start AI Bloks/LLMWare with my husband, who had a deep background in software and is a very early adopter of AI. We have been on this journey with our open source project LLMWare for the past 4 months, producing a…
2024 · github.com
- 11TO
2025 · github.com
- 12IO
Hey folks, I’m the creator of WFGY — a semantic reasoning framework for LLMs. After open-sourcing it, I did a full technical and value audit — and realized this engine might be worth $8M–$17M based on AI module licensing norms. If embedded as part of a platform core, the valuation could exceed $30M. Too late to pull it back. So here it is — fully free, open-sourced under MIT. --- ### What does it solve? Current LLMs (even GPT-4+) lack *self-consistent reasoning*. They struggle with: - Fragmented logic across turns - No internal loopback or self-calibration - No modular thought units - Weak…
2025 · github.com
- 13GO
LLMs are better at being the "mouth" than the "brain" and I can prove it mathematically. I built a deterministic graph engine that offloads reasoning from the LLM. It reduces token usage by 89% and makes a tiny 0.8B model trace enterprise execution paths flawlessly. Here is the white paper and the reproducible benchmark.
Mar 2026 · github.com
- 14CL
Hi HN! Run it: OPENROUTER_API_KEY="sk" npx bff-eval --demo We built a tool to help people take LLM outputs and easily grade them / eval them to know how good an assistant response is. We've built a number of LLM apps, and while we could ship decent tech demos, we were disappointed with how they'd perform over time. We worked with a few companies who had the same problem, and found out scientifically building prompts and evals is far from a solved problem... writing these things feels more like directing a play than coding. Inspired by Anthropic's constitutional ai concepts, and amazing…
2025 · github.com
- 15AN
2023 · github.com
- 16II
2023 · github.com
- 17OA
We built tooling that connects LLMs directly to case law databases with citation verification to address hallucination in legal AI. Think of it as giving the model access to actual legal sources instead of relying on training data.
Feb 2026 · openjuris.org
- 18RO
Hi HN! I'm Inacio, the author of REASON. I've been tinkering with LLMs since the GPT-3 API's release May 2020. Seeing the emergence of many frameworks in the last 15 months has been exciting. While many understandably focused on launching quick, I found myself intrigued by a different question: what would a thoughtful, first-principles approach look like? This curiosity led to a personal project, RΞASON, a minimalistic open-source TypeScript framework. It's been a couple of months of digging deep and learning a ton, and I'm eager to share it and grow it with insights from all of you. In the…
2023 · tryreason.dev
- 19AT
We kept shipping “simple” LLM features that were fluent-but-wrong. After too many postmortems we wrote down the failure patterns and added a small reasoning layer in front of the model. It’s model-agnostic, sits beside your existing stack, and you can implement it from a single PDF (MIT). What’s inside the PDF A problem map of 16 failure modes we kept hitting in real systems (OCR/layout drift, table-to-question mismatches, embedding≠meaning, pre-deploy collapse, etc.). Four lightweight gates you can add today: Knowledge-boundary canaries (empty/adversarial/known-fact probes).…
2025 · github.com
- 20

- 21E0
2017 · github.com
- 22AO
Hi, We are building an open-source framework for loading and structuring LLM context to create accurate and explainable LLM answers using knowledge graphs and vector stores. We built the tool with four main concepts in mind: 1. Loader -> uses dlt in the backend to load and structure the data 2. Cognify step -> creates a graph with summaries, labels and factoids that are interconnected across the documents and stored as a representation in the vector store 3. Optimizer -> Uses DSPy to optimize LLM queries, and we plan to extend it to most of the knobs we can turn, like chunking etc. 4. Search…
2024 · github.com
- 23LA
Hey Hacker News! I've been working on an open-source project called LLM Alignment Template, a comprehensive toolkit designed to help researchers, developers, and data scientists align large language models (LLMs) with human values using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). What the project does: Interactive Web Interface: Easily train models, visualize alignment metrics, and manage alignment with an accessible UI. Training with RLHF: Align models effectively to human preferences using feedback loops. Explainability: Built-in dashboards to help understand model behavior using…
2024 · github.com
- 24WA
WFGY introduces a PDF-based semantic protocol designed to correct projection collapse, contradiction loops, and ambiguous inference chains in LLMs. No retraining. No system calls. When parsed, the logic patterns alter reasoning trajectories directly. Prompt evaluation benchmarks show: ‣ +42.1% reasoning success ‣ +22.4% semantic alignment ‣ 3.6× stability in interpretive tasks The repo contains formal theory, prompt suites, and reproducible results. Zero dependencies. Fully open-source. Feedback from those working in alignment, interpretability, and logic-based scaffolding would be…
2025 · github.com
Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →