Alternatives
Products that do what ZEON Format does
Stop wasting money on JSON. Save 50%+ tokens on your LLMs
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4ID
ISON (Interchange Simple Object Notation) - a data format optimized for LLMs and Agentic AI. The problem: JSON wastes tokens. Curly braces, quotes, colons, commas - all eat into your context window. ISON uses tabular patterns that LLMs already understand from training data: JSON (87 tokens): { "users": [ {"id": 1, "name": "Alice", "email": "[email protected]"}, {"id": 2, "name": "Bob", "email": "[email protected]"} ] } ISON (34 tokens): table.users id:int name:string email 1 Alice [email protected] 2 Bob [email protected] Features: - 30-70% token reduction - Type annotations - References between…
Dec 2025 · github.com
- 5IA
2016 · github.com
- 6CL
2018 · github.com
- 7IB
After fine-tuning GPT for a personal project, I realized how tedious it is to write plain text in a massive JSON file. That's why I built this app for my own use, and I want to see if others could benefit from a tool like this as well ;)
2024 · finetuna-ui.com
- 8OS
2023 · github.com
- 9PR
Hi HN, While building RAG agents, I noticed a lot of token budget was wasted on formatting overhead (HTML tags, JSON structure, whitespace). Existing solutions felt too heavy (often requiring torch/transformers), so I wrote this lightweight, zero-dependency library to solve it. It includes strategies for context packing, PII redaction, and tool output compression. Benchmarks show it can save ~15% of tokens with negligible latency overhead (<0.5ms). Happy to answer any questions!
Dec 2025 · github.com
- 10OA
Thesys just open-sourced their generative UI rendering engine. Interesting timing given where Google a2ui and Vercel's json-render are headed. The difference worth noting: a2ui and json-render both treat JSONL as the contract between the LLM and the renderer. Thesys is betting that's the wrong primitive. Their engine uses a code-like syntax (OpenUI Lang) instead — LLM writes it, renderer executes it. The argument is that LLMs are fundamentally better at generating code than generating structured data, so you get cleaner output and ~67% fewer tokens. The broader vision seems to be a…
Mar 2026 · openui.com
- 11
- 12JD
We've all been there: you have some JSON data you need to make sense of, so you Google "json formatter" and end up at a site ridden with ads. I used to look at at lot of JSON (mostly log data) for $oldjob, so I set out to build something better. I know there are a lot of tools in this space, but I've put a lot of love into JSON Dive: things like Vim keyboard shortcuts to navigate, dark mode, timestamp/image previews, and multi-file-format-support (XML-in-JSON was a format I dealt with in the context of LLMs/tool calls). I've also made an effort to ensure it can handle large files,…
Sep 2025 · jsondive.app
- 13MO
2020 · jsonformatter.live
- 14JA
2019 · github.com
- 15TL
Little tool that I made to understand how (un)reasonable my prompts are.
Jan 2026 · github.com
- 16AS
2018 · medium.com
- 17EC
Hi! I've found myself repeatedly writing little scripts to do bulk calls to LLMs for various tasks. For example, run some analysis on a large list of records. There are a few "gotchas" to doing this. For example, some service providers have rate limits, and some models will not reliably return JSON (if you're asking for it). So, I've written a command for this. What I've tried to do here is let the user break up prompts and configuration as they see fit. For example, you can have a prompt file which includes the API key, rate limit, settings, etc. all together, or break these up into…
2025 · github.com
- 18ET
We built a browser extension (Chrome + Firefox) that captures the runtime DOM and exports it as JSON. Not the pre-render source (HTML/CSS/JS, templates, bundles) and not a screenshot — but the live, post-render state the browser is actually displaying: - visibility/hidden, disabled/required - current input values and validation/validationMessage - dataset attributes - trimmed text - stable selector paths Why: LLMs often miss or guess UI state. Screenshots are too opaque, pre-render source is too noisy. A structured snapshot gives reproducible context for debugging…
2025
- 19AT
I've been exploring how to describe UI layouts to LLMs efficiently. The problem: When you ask an AI to generate or modify UI, how do you describe the current state? - Natural language ("header on top, form below") is ambiguous - ASCII art breaks when edited (alignment issues) - HTML is precise but verbose I ran some measurements. For a simple login form: - Natural language: 102 tokens - ASCII art: 84 tokens - HTML: 330 tokens I experimented with a grid-based text format using Excel-like cell references: grid: 4x3 A1..D1: { type: txt, value: "Login" } A2..D2: { type: input, label: "Email" }…
Feb 2026 · github.com
- 20SE
I built a CLI tool in Go that extracts structured data (JSON, CSV, Parquet) from messy PDFs and HTML pages. The core idea: LLMs are great at understanding structure but wasteful for bulk data extraction. So smelt uses a two-pass architecture: 1. A fast Go capture layer parses the document and detects table-like regions 2. Those regions (not the whole document) get sent to Claude for schema inference — column names, types, nesting 3. The Go layer then does deterministic extraction using the inferred schema This means the LLM is never in the hot path of actual data processing. It figures out…
Mar 2026 · github.com
- 21XS
Hi HN. I made a little JS library for streaming structured data from LLMs using leniently-parsed XML as a medium. E.g. await simple('fun pet names', { schema: { name: Array(String) }, model: 'openrouter:mistralai/ministral-3b' }); // => ["Daisy", "Whiskers", "Rocky"] Demos: xmllm.j11y.io When using LLMs, I've ended up gravitating towards boring time-tested XML-esque tag-based delimiters instead of JSON/function-calling for the following reasons: - Diverse presence in training corpuses (consider flavours of content commonly adjacent to these syntaxes vs. JSON) - HTML was…
2024 · github.com
- 22SS
Hi HN, I’m building SEE (Semantic Entropy Encoding): a searchable compression format for JSON/NDJSON. Goal: reduce the “data tax” (storage/egress) and “CPU tax” (decompress/parse) by keeping JSON searchable while compressed, with page-level random access. I just published a proof-first evaluation release: Offline DEMO ZIP (~10 min): prints compression ratios + skip rates + lookup latency (p50/p95/p99) DD pack: audit/repro evidence (decode mismatch=0, extended mismatch=0, audit PASS) Latest release:…
Feb 2026 · gitlab.com
- 23
- 24LS
Ever had json.loads() explode halfway through an LLM stream? langdiff fixes that with a schema + callback approach. Define your schema → attach callbacks → push streaming tokens → get structured events immediately.
2025 · github.com
Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →