Alternatives
Products that do what AIStupidLevel does
Live AI benchmarks, drift alerts, and smart model routing
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
Trace, evaluate, and improve AI agents in production
30d ago · telerik.com
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14MD
We’re excited to share ML-Dev-Bench, a new open-source benchmark that tests AI agents on real-world ML development tasks. Unlike typical coding challenges or Kaggle-style competitions, our benchmark simulates end-to-end ML workflows including: - Dataset handling and preprocessing - Debugging model and code failures - Implementing new model architectures - Fine-tuning and improving existing models With 30 diverse tasks, ML-Dev-Bench evaluates agents across critical stages of ML development. To complement this, we built Calipers, a framework that provides systematic performance evaluation and…
2025 · github.com
- 15BA
I built CodeLens.AI - a tool that compares how 6 top LLMs (GPT-5, Claude Opus 4.1, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Grok 4, Gemini 2.5 Pro, o3) handle your actual code tasks. How it works: - Upload code + describe task (refactoring, security review, architecture, etc.) - All 6 models run in parallel (~2-5 min) - See side-by-side comparison with AI judge scores - Community votes on winners (blind voting) - Each evaluation gets reflected in the overall AI model leaderboard, showing us best ones Why I built this: Existing benchmarks (HumanEval, SWE-Bench) don't reflect real-world developer tasks. I wanted to…
Oct 2025 · codelens.ai
- 16
- 17AV
Apr 2026 · github.com
- 18CB
AI agents now have impressive reasoning capabilities. This raises an important question: how dangerous are these AI agents at identifying & exploiting web vulnerabilities? We created CVE-bench to find out (I'm one contributor of 16). To our knowledge CVE-bench is the first benchmark using real-world web vulnerabilities to evaluate AI agents' cyberattack capabilities. We included 40 CVEs from NIST's database, focusing on critical-severity vulnerability (CVSS > 9.0). To properly evaluate agents’ attacks, we built isolated environments with containerization and identified 8 common attack…
2025 · github.com
- 19IM
Hey HN! Thank you for all the support and feedback on my original submission 2 months ago. I've been improving the backend using a MCTS/AlphaZero approach and it's currently producing much better results. My long term goal is to allow users to manage multiple projects, deployed autonomously, both from scratch and by making continual updates all prompted with natural language. The cost of each project has been lowered to $9 as performance with smaller models has improved (I migrated from Claude-3-Opus to gemini-1.5-flash). Thanks for checking it out!
2024 · saas-quick.com
- 20SA
Writeup: https://www.deeptempo.ai/blogs/the-36-percent-false-positive...
Jul 2026 · github.com
- 21AC
There's LLM Council and similar tools, but they use predefined model lineups. This one is different in a few ways that mattered to me: *Bring your own models.* Mix Ollama (local), OpenAI, Anthropic, Groq, Google — or any OpenAI-compatible endpoint — in whatever combination you want. A council of DeepSeek-R1 + llama2-uncensored + mistral-nemo is a very different deliberation than GPT-4o + Claude + Gemini. *Zero server, zero account, zero storage.* The app is purely static. API calls go directly from your browser to providers. Nothing touches a backend. No tokens, no sessions, no analytics.…
Feb 2026 · github.com
- 22FA
Hi HN, We're excited to introduce Fixstars AIBooster, our new performance engineering tool designed to significantly accelerate AI model training while optimizing GPU utilization. AIBooster provides: Real-time monitoring of GPU, CPU, memory, and power consumption. Clear visibility into performance bottlenecks, helping developers optimize AI workloads. Proven acceleration of AI training processes—users commonly achieve up to 2-3x speed improvements. Significant cost savings by maximizing infrastructure efficiency. It's free to try, requires minimal setup, and integrates seamlessly into your…
2025 · fixstars.com
- 23CB
I built a small benchmark to test CLI coding agents on blind bug detection. A challenger agent injects bugs and writes ground truth (`bugs.json`). A different reviewer agent audits the repo without seeing ground truth, and an LLM matcher scores bug-to-finding assignments. Current run: 50 repos, 150 challenges, 450 reviews, 2,603 injected bugs. Weighted detection: Claude 58.05%, Codex 37.84%, Gemini 27.81%. LLM-judge benchmarks are easy to get wrong, so I’d really appreciate critical feedback on benchmark fairness, scoring/matching methodology, and obvious failure modes I’m missing. Full…
Feb 2026 · github.com
- 24
One API for leading AI models and video generation
26d ago · video.gqaiapp.com
Ranked by how close each launch is in meaning, then by votes. Refine with a description →